On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:03:54PM +0100, Luca Deri wrote:
> Justin
> I have put back the line you asked. Please check if everything is compliant
> with what your expected.
>
> Shall you have other requests/patches/suggestions please let us know.
>
> Thanks for your support Luca
Well, it does seem to work, but I did notice something odd.
On my old box with the older version before the change I see
#ldd /usr/local/lib/daq/daq_pfring.so
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffeefff000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f8280801000)
libpcap.so.1 => /opt/pfring/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x00007f82805b1000)
libpfring.so => /opt/pfring/lib/libpfring.so (0x00007f8280397000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8280036000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8280c2f000)
on the new box with the just fixed version I see
ldd /usr/local/lib/daq/daq_pfring.so
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff4097d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f91b573b000)
libpcap.so.1 => /opt/pfring/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x00007f91b54eb000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f91b5188000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f91b5b61000)
So on the new box the daq module is not directly linked to libpfring anymore.
I'm not sure if that is by design or not though.
The other change in that revision was to swap out
AC_CHECK_LIB([pfring], [pfring_open], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not link against
the PFRING library!])])
for a file based check(which also requires you to have pf_ring source in
~/PF_RING...)
--
-- Justin Azoff
-- Network Security & Performance Analyst
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
