I read diff between 6.0.3 and current SVN and do not found any changes
in parser :( Can you help me?

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Pavel Odintsov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I tried to do manual parsing and it failed with very strange results.
> I tried do manual parser with vanilla PF_RING and it work perfectly.
> But when I move to zc:eth4 everything goes weird.
>
> You can look at code example here:
> https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon/blob/master/pfring_parser_zc_issue.c
>
> Here you can find examples of broken packets generated in ZC mode:
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=2697283473][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=101][len=101][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=2427859156][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=1494][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=785972458][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=899][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=235012324][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=1514][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=235012324][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=1514][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=2452494655][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=669][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=3004425024][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=62][len=62][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=1947699452][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=82][len=82][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=4270253576][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=128][len=214][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [IPv4][5.45.121.206:0 ->
> 71.237.183.84:0] [l3_proto=TCP][hash=2404904871][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0]
> [caplen=74][len=74][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
>
>
> When I remove zc prefix everything goes OK:
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [vlan 100]
> [IPv4][46.36.217.163:60425 -> 66.212.227.177:80]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=1895475635][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=3109618290]
> [caplen=74][len=74][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=70]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [vlan 100]
> [IPv4][185.4.74.46:80 -> 79.104.202.167:29676]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=141396247][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=2414040755]
> [caplen=128][len=1422][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=58]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 00:19:E2:B1:EF:C1] [vlan 103]
> [IPv4][5.45.125.197:80 -> 94.19.227.237:19226]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=1665248546][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=3106769437]
> [caplen=128][len=1322][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=58]
> [00:19:E2:B1:EF:C1 -> 90:E2:BA:49:85:C8] [IPv4][188.123.252.42:54821
> -> 5.45.117.243:80]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=3249162392][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=3384753169]
> [caplen=64][len=64][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=54]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [vlan 100]
> [IPv4][159.253.23.8:443 -> 93.80.68.118:52364]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=4249758155][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=4188560676]
> [caplen=128][len=320][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=58]
> [5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0 -> 90:E2:BA:49:85:C8] [IPv4][54.231.136.26:80 ->
> 159.253.18.81:36360]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=3605342409][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=2042671898]
> [caplen=64][len=64][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=54]
> [90:E2:BA:49:85:C8 -> 5C:5E:AB:24:0F:C0] [vlan 100]
> [IPv4][159.253.20.133:80 -> 178.18.208.229:41361]
> [l3_proto=TCP][hash=1376814929][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=1451307525]
> [caplen=128][len=1522][parsed_header_len=0][eth_offset=-14][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=58]
>
> Could you help me?
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Odintsov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thank you for fast and useful answer! :)
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> No, with standard drivers it uses kernel threads (ksoftirq)
>>>
>>> Alfredo
>>>
>>>> On 21 Oct 2014, at 10:00, Pavel Odintsov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Yep, I can run it in my tool but standard parser with no-zc mode
>>>> spread for all cores. It uses additional threads inside pf_ring?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov



-- 
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to