ZC works in zero-copy (no packet copy), thus capturing the whole packet or just 
a snaplen does not affect performance.

Alfredo

> On 19 Dec 2014, at 17:57, Pavel Odintsov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your help, Alfredo! I integrated ZC support via native
> ZC API and everything works nice.
> 
> But I can't find any analogue for snaplen in ZC API. I need only
> packet headers for processing. Can I do it with ZC API?
> 
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Pavel
>> for 10 Gbit line-rate you definitely need ZC, you can use hw RSS for 
>> spreading load across multiple instances of your application or custom 
>> software distribution (using for instance zbalance_ipc).
>> 
>> For packet parsing you can use pfring_parse_pkt(), according to what you 
>> need you should call:
>> pfring_parse_pkt(pkt /* u_char* */, &hdr /* struct pfring_pkthdr* */, 3 /* 
>> up to L3 */, 0 /* no timestamp */, 0 /* no hash */);
>> 
>> Alfredo
>> 
>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 20:00, Pavel Odintsov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello, folks!
>>> 
>>> I'm working on OSS solution for DDoS detection
>>> (https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon) and passed through hard
>>> way of: pcap, ulog2, pf_ring.
>>> 
>>> I'm really amazed PF_RING and I can analyze streams up to 2 million
>>> packets per second on really slow hw (i7 2600 with Intel 82599).
>>> 
>>> But my final target - provide monitoring ability on wire rate 10GBps
>>> and 14Mpps. I tried to use plain pf_ring, multichannel pf_ring and
>>> start thinking about ZC....
>>> 
>>> Maybe somebody can recommend best and fastest approach for my task? I
>>> need small amount of packet headers (src/dst ip, src/dst port,
>>> protocol). For extracting data I surely need some sort of packets
>>> parser.
>>> 
>>> Fastest solution which I did now is multichannel pf_ring with 8
>>> threads for collection data. But I can process only up to 2-3 MPPS and
>>> after this I got completely overloaded system:
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/m2ywqgwul8ka7ww/htoppng.png?dl=0
>>> 
>>> Is it possible to process more packets on non-zc PF_RING or I should
>>> go to ZC mode? :(
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to