-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Yes, 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 currently.

Jim

On 07/27/2015 06:56 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano wrote:
> Hi Jim it seems bpf filters generated by libpcap cause strange
> behaviours with your kernel, the same code you are testing works
> just fine on kernel 3.13.0-58, while you have 3.10 right?
> 
> Alfredo
> 
>> On 23 Jul 2015, at 20:53, Jim Hranicky <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> That seems to be working. Unfortunately, specifying a BPF filter
>> is now causing a kernel panic.
>> 
>> Command:
>> 
>> /usr/local/pf/sbin/tcpdump -nn -i net1 -c 10 not port 22
>> 
>> vmcore-dmesg attached.
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> On 07/22/2015 04:31 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano wrote:
>>> Hi Jim there is a fix for this, please pull latest code from
>>> git, the problem is that tcpdump is setting “empty" filters
>>> when no filter is specified.
>>> 
>>> Alfredo
>>> 
>>>> On 21 Jul 2015, at 16:07, Jim Hranicky <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Signed PGP part Was the latest trace helpful?
>>>> 
>>>> Jim
>>>> 
>>>> On 07/15/2015 04:55 PM, Jim Hranicky wrote:
>>>>> Patch applied.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Command:
>>>>> 
>>>>> /usr/local/pf/sbin/tcpdump -nn -i net1 -c 10
>>>>> 
>>>>> dmesg attached (everything after PF_RING load).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jim
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 07/15/2015 09:15 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jim this requires a bit of debugging because
>>>>>> bpf_filter_skb() is not supposed to be called with the
>>>>>> command you provided, but this does not seem to be the
>>>>>> case from the trace. Could you apply this patch and
>>>>>> provide the dmesg output after running the application?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you Alfredo
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/pf_ring.c b/kernel/pf_ring.c index 
>>>>>> 5433e89..0d52c26 100644 --- a/kernel/pf_ring.c +++ 
>>>>>> b/kernel/pf_ring.c @@ -4030,7 +4030,8 @@ static int 
>>>>>> add_skb_to_ring(struct sk_buff *skb, 
>>>>>> atomic_inc(&pfr->num_ring_users);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /* [1] BPF Filtering */ -  if(pfr->bpfFilter) { +  if (0)
>>>>>> { + //if(pfr->bpfFilter) { if(bpf_filter_skb(skb, pfr,
>>>>>> displ) == 0) { atomic_dec(&pfr->num_ring_users);
>>>>>> return(-1); @@ -7491,7 +7492,7 @@ static int
>>>>>> ring_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, case 
>>>>>> SO_ATTACH_FILTER: ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -    if(unlikely(enable_debug)) + 
>>>>>> //if(unlikely(enable_debug)) printk("[PF_RING] BPF
>>>>>> filter (%d)\n", 0);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> if(optlen == sizeof(struct sock_fprog)) {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc
>>>>>> mailing list [email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc
>>>> mailing list [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc
>>> mailing list [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>> 
>> <vmcore-dmesg.txt>_______________________________________________
>>
>> 
Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing
> list [email protected] 
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlW2OugACgkQCGX2wHRYUXQLvQD8CBo/ixK1hJXUhi+zL8B4g/Gp
B06jacoBztailiSLz+IA/0Gd9YlPEkoPA3sM+oOf4ANPcClcfuTiWchONU+q27uZ
=gHQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to