Hi Alfredo,
we can't just ignore trasparent mode.

Let me describe our case.
We run zbalance_ipc in ZC mode with *-n 22 -g 1 *(binding it to the core
#1). Then we run our multithread app that connects to zbalance cluster
queues and comsumes traffic.
If we have loaded pf_ring without *trasparent_mode=2*, core#1 is overloaded
and balancer drops some packets.
If we have loaded pf_ring with *trasparent_mode=2*, everything is Ok, no
drops.

Is there any opportunity to handle this problem in other way? May be some
other arguments?

Serge.

2016-09-16 10:29 GMT+03:00 Alfredo Cardigliano <cardigli...@ntop.org>:

> Hi Serge
> why do you need transparent_mode for adjusting interrupts? You can just
> ignore transparent_mode and configure it in the same way.
>
> Alfredo
>
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 22:49, Сяргей Башлыкевіч <bashlykev...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Previously we used to adjust the interrupts by loading pf_ring with
> argument [*transparent_mode=2*]. But in the latest version of pf_ring it
> is marked as deprecated.
>
> Could you please recommend what we should use instead of [
> *transparent_mode]*?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Best regards,
> Serge Bashlykevich.
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to