Hi Amir
copying those function is definitely the simplest solution and it should work 
fine for you,
as of extended_hdr.parsed_header_len please just remove the if branch and 
delete any
occurrence as that was the length of metadata when using kernel plugins 
(deprecated).

Regards
Alfredo

> On 21 Aug 2017, at 12:31, Amir Kaduri <akadur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Since its about 6 functions, a possible solution could be just copying them 
> to the application as static functions. Not a perfect solution, but possible. 
> If there is a better one (that is simple), I'll be glad to hear.
> Anyway, another thing in the same context:
> The (deprecated) pfcount_bundle.c example application, had a check "if 
> (h->extended_hdr.parsed_header_len > 0)". "parsed_header_len" has been also 
> removed from struct pfring_extended_pkthdr{} since pf_ring 6.6.0
> (on Oct 19, 2016). I assume it was calculated during packet parsing. Could 
> you please suggest a simple alternative to this check, based on pf_ring 6.6.0?
> Thanks
> 
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Amir Kaduri <akadur...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:akadur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Small correction: Jul-15, 2016. Sorry.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Amir Kaduri <akadur...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:akadur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I have an application written in the past, that heavily consists on bundle 
> API in general, and on pfcount_bundle example application specifically. These 
> APIs were deprecated on Jul-15, 2017 and don't exist anymore in pf_ring 6.6.0.
> What is the easiest way to adjust the existing code in order to be able to 
> compile and run based on pf_ring 6.6.0?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to