Ok. And one can expect to reach more than 1Gb/s on vanilla drivers right?
On a somewhat decent server... Xeon with PCIe x8 NIC...

​Regards
Marco​



2018-01-25 19:52 GMT+00:00 Luca Deri <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On 25 Jan 2018, at 20:29, Marco Teixeira <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> I have the details and was going to generate de license fo 10Gb/s... but I
> was expecting an option for "Standard NIC" and only see Intel, Myricom and
> Napatech/DAG/Fiberblaze...
> Wich one should I choose to make for my "Standard NIC" that uses PF_RING
> in NAPI mode?
> ​Or maybe there was some misunderstanding here?​
>
> Yes there is some disconnection Marco
>
> You only need a license for ZC drivers, otherwise you will use vanilla
> drivers. So pfcount -i zc:ens2f0 requires a ZC drivers,  pfcount -i ens2f0
> does not
>
> Please see https://github.com/ntop/PF_RING/wiki for details
>
> Regards Luca
>
>
> ​Regards, and thank you for your advice, and time,
> Marco​
>
>
>
> 2018-01-25 12:05 GMT+00:00 Luca Deri <[email protected]>:
>
>> Marco
>> our licenses don’t have a cap on speed, but they are per device family.
>> So if these devices as 10G you need a 10G license
>>
>> As you’re a university you can mail [email protected] for free licenses
>>
>> Regards Luca
>>
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2018, at 12:52, Marco Teixeira <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Regarding the output below, does one need a license to be able to run
>> 10Gb/s speeds (please mind, I'm only talking about pf_ring. nprobe is
>> already licensed with "enterprise pro")?
>>
>>
>> ===
>> [marco@nprobe ~]$ sudo pfcount -L -v1 | grep ens2f
>> Name    SystemName      Module  MAC                     BusID
>>  NumaNode        Status  License
>> ens2f0  ens2f0          pf_ring D8:D3:85:A0:12:50       0000:13:00.0
>> -1              Up      NotFound
>> ens2f1  ens2f1          pf_ring D8:D3:85:A0:12:54       0000:13:00.1
>> -1              Down    NotFound
>> [marco@nprobe ~]$
>> [marco@nprobe ~]$ cat /proc/net/pf_ring/dev/ens2f0/info
>> Name:         ens2f0
>> Index:        6
>> Address:      D8:D3:85:A0:12:50
>> Polling Mode: NAPI
>> Type:         Ethernet
>> Family:       Standard NIC
>> # Bound Sockets:  1
>> TX Queues:    1
>> RX Queues:    1
>> ===
>> ​
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marco
>>
>>
>>
>> 2018-01-18 10:35 GMT+00:00 Marco Teixeira <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi Afredo and anyone "listening",
>>>
>>> I would like to rule out if pf_ring is the culprit here...
>>> What would be the correct way to have nprobe use libpcap (or
>>> AF_PACKET??) mode of getting packets from the NIC?
>>> Blacklisting pf_ring module from loading?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Marco
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2018-01-17 22:16 GMT+00:00 Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> “Absolute Stats” is the total / average number of packets/bytes
>>>> “Actual Stats” is the current number of packets/bytes (last second)
>>>>
>>>> Alfredo
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 21:13, Marco Teixeira <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello list,
>>>>
>>>> Any PFRING wizard that can offer clues on where to start
>>>> troubleshooting this variance between "Absolut Stats" vs "Actual Stats"...?
>>>>
>>>> ​
>>>> ===
>>>> [marco@nprobe ~]$ sudo pfcount -i ens2f0
>>>> [sudo] password for marco:
>>>> Using PF_RING v.7.0.0
>>>> Capturing from ens2f0 [mac: D8:D3:85:A0:12:50][if_index: 5][speed:
>>>> 10000Mb/s]
>>>> # Device RX channels: 1
>>>> # Polling threads:    1
>>>> Dumping statistics on /proc/net/pf_ring/stats/3096-ens2f0.3
>>>> =========================
>>>> Absolute Stats: [136'980 pkts total][0 pkts dropped][0.0% dropped]
>>>> [136'980 pkts rcvd][126'559'478 bytes rcvd]
>>>> =========================
>>>>
>>>> =========================
>>>> Absolute Stats: [274'202 pkts total][0 pkts dropped][0.0% dropped]
>>>> [274'202 pkts rcvd][254'708'653 bytes rcvd][274'163.89
>>>> pkt/sec][2'037.38 Mbit/sec]
>>>> =========================
>>>> Actual Stats: [137'222 pkts rcvd][1'000.13 ms][137'202.92 pps][1.03
>>>> Gbps]
>>>> =========================
>>>>
>>>> =========================
>>>> Absolute Stats: [411'199 pkts total][0 pkts dropped][0.0% dropped]
>>>> [411'199 pkts rcvd][382'383'683 bytes rcvd][205'575.03
>>>> pkt/sec][1'529.35 Mbit/sec]
>>>> =========================
>>>> Actual Stats: [136'997 pkts rcvd][1'000.09 ms][136'983.43 pps][1.02
>>>> Gbps]
>>>> =========================
>>>> ===
>>>>
>>>> Thankx
>>>> Marco
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to