Thought I would also chime in. Seeing the same as well, also setup a caching
Bind server to see if that would speed things up, and it didn't. Just my two
cents.

Cheers,
Eric

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Gary Gatten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lol!  I have dns issues, but different than your.  If I rul more than a
> sinle resolution thread ntop will die a horrible death.
>
> There's no dnscache.db for some time now.  If u want caching try a caching
> resolver.  I used bind.
>
> What do you want to start from scratch?  There's no caching or other
> history related to resolution.
>
> After reviewing your problem it seems to be something with your dns and/or
> local resolver conf.  What exactly is the issue?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Charles Gagnon [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 12:57 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Ntop] DNS Resolution half working
>
> Nobody has DNS resolition issues?
>
> Did something replace dnsCache.db? Which of the DB files would I need
> to restart from scratch?
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Charles Gagnon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > These are all private servers. We use private addresses inside and NAT
> > out to the internet. All my servers use internal DNS servers. I have
> > /etc/resolv.conf setup as it should and nsswitch.conf says:
> >
> > hosts:      files nis dns
> >
> > So I'm thinking gethostbyaddr() should work fine. I feel like
> > resolution was attempted at some point and results were cached and now
> > it's not retrying. But I can't find "dnsCache.db" yet the man page
> > still refers to it.
> >
> > I started with:
> >
> > # ntop -P /usr/local/var/ntop -u ntop -d
> >
> > And this is what I have:
> >
> > [root@sys1 ~]# ls -l /usr/local/var/ntop/
> > total 2072
> > -rw-r----- 1 ntop ntop  225280 Sep 27 09:20 fingerprint.db
> > -rw-r----- 1 ntop ntop 1986634 Sep 26 12:55 macPrefix.db
> > -rw-r----- 1 ntop ntop   12546 Oct 21  2010 ntop_pw.db
> > -rw-r----- 1 ntop ntop   14094 Sep 27 09:20 prefsCache.db
> > drwxrwxrwx 5 ntop ntop    4096 Oct 21  2010 rrd
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Burton Strauss III
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 192.168.x.x/16 is the private space (RFC 1913).  So no public facing DNS
> >> server would resolve those.  It would only be resolved if you were
> pointing
> >> to your internal DNS server AND it was setup to manage the specific
> zone.
> >> So the question is where is nslookup getting names from?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Burton
> >>
> >> %QUOTE%
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Gagnon
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:12 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [Ntop] DNS Resolution half working
> >>
> >> I searched for references and I can't find what this error could be.
> >> When listing hosts (specially in the throughput list I use a lot), some
> >> hosts get resolved and others don't and I can't figure out why.
> >> I've setup DNS resolution to 'All' (though I tried "local" and "Local
> >> + Remote").
> >>
> >> When I look at the list, a number of items have names, others should the
> IP
> >> with "[IP]" after. Seems very consistent, the same hosts are resolved
> and
> >> the same show IPs between restarts.
> >>
> >> I was thinking of flushing out dnsCache.db but I don't that exists in
> >> 4.1.0 (gone since 3.x maybe?).
> >>
> >> When I dump the hosts, I see some with names and others without:
> >>
> >> 192.168.206.11|0|'192.168.206.11'|'192.168.206.11'|[...]
> >> 192.168.206.10|0|'192.168.206.10'|'hhnas01'|[...]
> >> 192.168.206.13|0|'192.168.206.13'|'192.168.206.13'|[...]
> >> 192.168.206.12|0|'192.168.206.12'|'192.168.206.12'|[...]
> >> 192.168.206.15|0|'192.168.206.15'|'hhutil01'|[...]
> >> 192.168.206.14|0|'192.168.206.14'|'192.168.206.14'|[...]
> >>
> >> Any ideas? Any other "cache" I can get rid of. Testing with nslookup
> yields
> >> a name for all those IPs.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Charles Gagnon
> >> charlesg at unixrealm.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ntop mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ntop mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charles Gagnon
> > charlesg at unixrealm.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Gagnon
> charlesg at unixrealm.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
>
>
> <font size="1">
> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in
> 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
> </div>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
>  and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>  any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
>  and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>  received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>  return email and delete this email from your system."
> </font>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to