Hello everyone

I'm looking for advice on how to best optimize ntop under the 
following hardware/software contraints:

Sun Netra T1
single UltraSPARC-IIi 440MHz processor
512MB RAM
1536MB swap
2 SUNW,hme network interfaces
Solaris 8 (Generic_108528-14)

This machine's primary purpose is to analyze network activity. One 
interface is connected to a hub along with a Cisco PIX, which all 
traffic is routed through. The other interface is connected to a 
hub on the internal network. We are serviced by a 3-node OC-3 Sonet 
Ring (~36Mbps).

I successfully built & installed ntop 2.0.99 rc2 a week ago, but am 
having problems keeping it up with all the network traffic. I tried 
the latest CVS snapshot - same thing.

The command line I am using to fire it up is:

/usr/local/bin/ntop -u $myusername -a /var/ntop -d -D $domain -m 
10.0.0.0/8,$classB/16 -LN -i hme0,hme1 -P /var/ntop -t 5 -w 3000 -W 
3001

(where $myusername is my login name, $domain is the org's domain 
name, and $classB is the org's class B IP block - I apologize for 
the paranoia!)

The program runs fine for a while (<30 minutes) but eventually the 
web interface hangs whenever you click on anything. The CPU usage 
for the ntop process is usually somewhere around 60-70%, and the 
size around 550MB.

Is my problem that the machine I'm attempting to do this on simply 
cannot keep up with the amount of traffic coming accross the wire? 
If so, would a kernel packet filter help solve the problem?

I've installed & used ntop on several other servers (X86 Linux 
boxes, mostly) without any problems like this. Granted the traffic 
on this machine is much greater than on those other servers, is 
there some possibility that there could be some flakiness with the 
Solaris port of ntop?

My thanks go to Luca and all of the others who helped bring this 
awesome piece of software to the open source community!

Regards,

Lars Peterson








_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to