Stanley- no worries - 2.1-1 is 2.1 + a few Makefile changes. We had some confusion between Luca and myself - I called it 2.1-1, he called it 2.1.1.
With the latest release, 2.1.2, we've cleaned up the confusion. Still, the differences between 2.1 and 2.1.2 are slight - documented at SourceForge if you need to see them. I'll address the FreeBSD issue later - I think I have a guess... (hint static) -----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stanley Hopcroft Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ntop] [FreeBSD 4.5-R]NTOP Won't Run As A Daemon Dear Sir, I am writing to say that I am not having any problems with ntop-2.1.0 running as a daemon on FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE-p10. I have built ntop from source using static linking with the supplied (in the tgz) versions of zlib libpng and gdchart - following the directions in the README; I may have different versions of these installed separately but am not knowledgable enough to have ntop use them. In my case I am using almost certainly older versions of autoconf and automake but I found they were only necessary should I want to modify configure.in (in a vain attempt to build the RMON plugin). In all the production instances, the supplied configure worked fine. ALthough the tgz identifies itself as ntop-2.1-1, the version reported by the about llink on the web pages is 2.1.0. I have 6 copies of ntop all running on modest hardware under the same release of FreeBSD. Both daemonisation and stability are not a problem. Yours sincerely. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stanley Hopcroft ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop
