Arnt, that's a little strident, don't you think - given that you aren't paying me for my time?
-----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arnt Karlsen Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ntop] Huge protocol list? On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:49:51 -0700, "Burton Strauss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The constant isn't referenced anymore - grep for it :-) ntop now > scans the file to count entries and then malloc()s enough entries. > > The other problem is that to eliminate the "empty" columns would > require pre-scanning the (huge) tables to find out what's populated... > > It could be done, but there's a processing implication and also it can > cause problems for scripts that process the output but don't know the > possible set of columns. Have to think on this for a while - what's > the feeling from other users? > ..put it in 2.1.4 and 2.1.51. Now. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop
