On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:25:34 -0500, "Burton M. Strauss III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:49:51 -0700, > > "Burton Strauss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > The constant isn't referenced anymore - grep for it :-) ntop now > > > scans the file to count entries and then malloc()s enough entries. > > > > > > The other problem is that to eliminate the "empty" columns would > > > require pre-scanning the (huge) tables to find out what's > > > populated... > > > > > > It could be done, but there's a processing implication and also it > > > can cause problems for scripts that process the output but don't > > > know the possible set of columns. Have to think on this for a > > > while - what's the feeling from other users? > > > > ..put it in 2.1.4 and 2.1.51. Now. > > Arnt, that's a little strident, don't you think - given that you > aren't paying me for my time?
..agreed, sorry, tried to be brief and 'to the point'. It _is_ a good attition. :-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop
