On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:46:49 +0200, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:25:34 -0500, > "Burton M. Strauss III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:49:51 -0700, > > > "Burton Strauss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > The constant isn't referenced anymore - grep for it :-) ntop > > > > now scans the file to count entries and then malloc()s enough > > > > entries. > > > > > > > > The other problem is that to eliminate the "empty" columns would > > > > require pre-scanning the (huge) tables to find out what's > > > > populated... > > > > > > > > It could be done, but there's a processing implication and also > > > > it can cause problems for scripts that process the output but > > > > don't know the possible set of columns. Have to think on this > > > > for a while - what's the feeling from other users? > > > > > > > ..put it in 2.1.4 and 2.1.51. Now. > > > > Arnt, that's a little strident, don't you think - given that you > > aren't paying me for my time? > > ..agreed, sorry, tried to be brief and 'to the point'. > It _is_ a good attition. :-) A ..addition, not --/ ...yet another goof on my part. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop
