On Wed, 28 May 2003 12:11:08 -0500, "Burton M. Strauss III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> RH9 - problems - do bears you-know-what in the woods??? ..in the woods, no problems, on your legs........ > If you download RH's latest kernel package - kernel-2.4.20-8.src.rpm - > there are 149 source patches to the base kernel. 71 more than their > old 2.4.18 kernel version. Some are minor, some are quite major. ..fwiw, el ultimo is 2.4.20-13.7|8|9, does anyone use it successfully? > Stuff like ptrace - which, while it fixes a privledge escalation > attack, also breaks stuff like gdb. > > At this point, until RH get their act together and can offer versions > of essential tools that WORK together, I can't recommend RH9. .._not_ Microsoft's marketing weenie talk this time around: "We're looking at the issues involved." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 ..note how the priority is "High" but severity is "Normal". ;-) > What I have is a RH8 system updated w/ the 2.4.18-27.8.0smp kernel, > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.6, and gcc-3.2-7 - so it's as current a RH8 as can > be, as least as of the last time I ran up2date... > > Beyond that, you're on your own. ..with Red Hat, you _are_ on your own. If you have RH-7.3, you have the best RH I am aware of, from 7.3, quality dived. ..ntop on Debian-3.0r1, anyone? IMHO, if you need ntop for any chargeable purpose, you also need to run it on Debian or better. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
