This shows the routing of the flows through ntop's handing... it's the audit
trail - read though plugins/netFlowPlugin.c...

      Gives: # Pkts Received 7,561
      Less: # Pkts with bad version 0

7561 - 0 = 7561

      Gives: # Pkts processed 7,561
      # Flows per packet(avg) 30.0

30 * 7561 = 226830 individual flow records

      # Flows received 226,830

Flows can be ignored for various superficial reasons:

      Less: # Flows with zero packet count 0
      Less: # Flows with zero byte count 0
      Less: # Flows with bad data 0

This then is the # actually processed:

      Gives: # Flows processed 226,830

      Ignored Flows

Or ignored for more profund (really, it's not simple vs. profound, it's just
rejected further along in the code) reasons:

      port zero 8427

means that sport or dport were 0 and the flow is ignored...

      in handleIP() 55417

comes from this code:

          if(handleIP(dport, srcHost, dstHost, len, 0, 0, actualDeviceId)
== -1)
            if(handleIP(sport, srcHost, dstHost, len, 0, 0, actualDeviceId)
== -1) {
              flowIgnoredInHandleIP++;

or it's relative (ntop chooses the lesser of sport/dport as the assumed
'server port'):

          if(handleIP(sport, srcHost, dstHost, len, 0, 0, actualDeviceId)
== -1)
            if(handleIP(dport, srcHost, dstHost, len, 0, 0, actualDeviceId)
== -1) {
              flowIgnoredInHandleIP++;

where handleIP (the ntop routine in pbuf.c, around line 87) returned -1,
indicating it couldn't process the flow record:

int handleIP(u_short port,
             HostTraffic *srcHost, HostTraffic *dstHost,
             u_int _length,  u_short isPassiveSess,
             u_short p2pSessionIdx, int actualDeviceId) {
  int idx;
  Counter length = (Counter)_length;

  if((srcHost == NULL) || (dstHost == NULL)) {
    traceEvent(CONST_TRACE_ERROR, "Sanity check failed (4) [Low memory?]");
    return(-1);
  }

  if(isPassiveSess) {
    /* Emulate non passive session */
    idx = myGlobals.FTPIdx;
  } else {
    if(p2pSessionIdx) {
      switch(p2pSessionIdx) {
      case FLAG_P2P_GNUTELLA:
        idx = myGlobals.GnutellaIdx;
        break;
      case FLAG_P2P_KAZAA:
        idx = myGlobals.KazaaIdx;
        break;
      case FLAG_P2P_WINMX:
        idx = myGlobals.WinMXIdx;
        break;
      case FLAG_P2P_DIRECTCONNECT:
        idx = myGlobals.DirectConnectIdx;
        break;
      default:
        idx = -1;
        break;
      }
    } else
      idx = mapGlobalToLocalIdx(port);
  }

  if(idx == -1)
    return(-1); /* Unable to locate requested index */
  else if(idx >= myGlobals.numIpProtosToMonitor) {
    traceEvent(CONST_TRACE_ERROR, "Discarding idx=%d for port=%d", idx,
port);
    return(-1);
  }


It could be an unknown form of P2P software (but p2pSessionIdx should only
be set for recognized ones), so the most common reason is this:

idx = mapGlobalToLocalIdx(port);

which means that you've got traffic on a server port ntop isn't monitoring.

-----Burton



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco
Teixeira
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ntop] losing netflows


Hi there...
After searching the list, couldn't find anything that would explain me
whuy this hapens....

Wouldn't you say that it is losing too many flows  ? ? ?
What does PORT 0 and IN HANDLEIP() means ?

I'm exporting from Cisco 7500 in version 5 with no aggregation ...

TIA

Marco

Below is a copy past from ntop

      Flow Statistics
      Flow Senders 192.168.230.254 [7,561 pkts]

      Gives: # Pkts Received 7,561
      Less: # Pkts with bad version 0
      Gives: # Pkts processed 7,561
      # Flows per packet(avg) 30.0
      # Flows received 226,830
      Less: # Flows with zero packet count 0
      Less: # Flows with zero byte count 0
      Less: # Flows with bad data 0
      Gives: # Flows processed 226,830
      Ignored Flows
      port zero 8427
      in handleIP() 55417



_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to