>   MAC ----> (5)IP ------------------------> (7)DNS
>                     \                  /
>                      \-> (6)NetBIOS --/--><end>
>

Yep, 7 and 6 sorted (as a whole or one after another doesn't matter in my
opinion, if you can differentiate the entries e.g. using capitals as the 
NetBios
names and lower case for the DNS entries), after that named group the IPs
and then the MACs should generate the 'lists of least anstonishement'. 

> > > I'm please it worked - was it the code change or purging dnsCache.db 
that
> > > did it?

Not absolutely but quite sure that it was the code change but I use to remove
the whole ntop root dir before testing. Made not the dnsCache test.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Stanley Hopcroft
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:25 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Ntop] New sorting routines in cvs - these are post 3.0pre1
> > - TEST NOW OR HOLD YOUR WATER
> >
> >
> > Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:57:06PM -0600, Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
> > > I'm please it worked - was it the code change or purging
> >
> > dnsCache.db that
> >
> > > did it?
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have specialized needs you can change the values in the
> > > globals-defines.h constants.  Highest value wins.  The block
> >
> > where a value
> >
> > > is chosen if hostResolvedName isn't set is a little more difficult to
> > > change, but could be done - it's in webInterface.c
> > >
> > > As to why favor IP over NetBIOS, that's a simple piece of reality -
> > > most networks where people are using ntop have TCP/IP and most of
> >
> > them have some
> >
> > > form of DNS.
> >
> > A good choice since with 'Active' Directory (and even before that with
> > eg ISC DHCP v3.x), most sites will be using Dynamic DNS into which all
> > hosts will register their NetBIOS names when they boot and release them
> > when they power down.
> >
> > WINS is on the way out, but NetBIOS names will remain.
> >
> > The only difference, if I understand correctly, is that NetBIOS name
> > resolution will no longer have the option of broadcast and that key
> > names (domain names for example) will be registered with SRV resource
> > records (which the microsoft version of nslookup can already handle).
> >
> > Client names (eg the NetBIOS name of the requestor) will be registered
> > with A records.
> >
> > Yours sincerely.
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Stanley Hopcroft
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > '...No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
> > continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
> > Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
> > manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes
> > me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know
> > for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee...'
> >
> > from Meditation 17, J Donne.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ntop mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to