First off, thanks to everyone on the list for the help in the past.
I've now got 6 linux machines running ntop at 6 sites here at our org.
That could never have happened without your help :)  Between MRTG and
NTOP, this has been one hell of a year.  It's damned nice to know what's
going on ..

Anyways, enough ass kissing.  But I felt it necessary to prep as I've
got a couple of dumb newbie questions.  Not so much how-to questions,
but .. eh, you'll see.

Now that we're up, running, collecting and reporting with ntop, I'd like
to shake things up by testing working with netflow.  We're
cisco-everywhere, so it shouldn't be a problem.

I've read through the "NTop, NetFlow and Cisco Routers" document by
Jonathan Feldman (sorry, no URL handy).  Using that doc, I've been able
to collect and report on netflow statistics.  Great! :)

Now for my question (and I probably could have just jumped right here):
is it possible to merge netflow statistics?  I know, by default, it's
not.  Simply activating the netflow plug-in forces all interfaces to be
reported seperately.  Is there some type of workaround?

This is why I'm asking:  at our primary site, we have 3 major WAN links.
As it stands now, I'm sniffing that data with the ntop box which has an
interface on each of those critical segments (core to primary WAN router
(frame relay), core to secodnary WAN router (collection of point to
point t1's) and core to firewall).

With ntop now, I merge all this traffic and get a great "complete
picture" of what folks are up to.

If I were to switch to 3 NetFlow's, I'd have to constantly switch
between them to get a good idea of what's going on.  It has to do with
the way our network passes traffic.  For example, a user in a remote
office requests a web page.  His local router decides that traffic is
best routed over the t1.  It arrives at HQ on the secondary router and
hops directly over to the firewall, as it's the gateway of last resort.
Internet magic happens, and the data from the users request comes back
in.  The router in HQ decides to send it over frame relay.

I'd have to look at 3 separate netflow interfaces to get the "complete"
picture .. at  least from here at HQ.

Is this making sense?  Am I overlooking something stupid that makes my
question moot?  Is this something that's in my newbieness I missed was
asked each week for the last 30 weeks in the archive?  Heh.  I hope not
:)

Thanks and sorry for the freakin' BOOK of an email for a simple
question.

Thanks,
Jon. 
--------------------------------------------------------
The information in this transmission is privileged and confidential and intended only 
for the recipient listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments 
without retaining a copy. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, or the taking 
of any action based upon it, is strictly prohibited. 
Thank you. 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to