We've discussed this in the past - AFAIR nobody ever really figured out what
RH means.  There's no specific POSIX limitation, etc., but it could be that
EL3 is finally enforcing whatever that warning means.

I don't have EL3, so I can't test in that environment.

-----Burton

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mitesh P Choksi
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Ntop] killed by SIGSEGV
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am having ntop dying in a few minutes of starting.
>
> I use WhiteBox Linux EL3 which is based on RedHat EL 3.0
>
> dmesg after ntop dies shows the following:
> application bug: ntop(20149) has SIGCHLD set to SIG_IGN but calls wait().
> (see the NOTES section of 'man 2 wait'). Workaround activated.
> device eth0 left promiscuous mode
>
> strace -p <pid> shows the following:
> rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
> rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
> nanosleep({10, 0}, 0xbfffb054)          = -1 EINTR (Interrupted
> system call)
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
>
> I turned on debugging (-K) but don't get any hints from /var/log/messages.
>
> I have tried googling but have not found any specific answer. I need to
> know how to I go around troubleshooting current ntop problem.
>
> Thanking you in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cyberdude Murli
> Land of the Kilimanjaro
> The World!
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to