I don't have a Mac and so have no way to make it.
Realistically, the Darwin counts from the logs are pretty low:
63 Darwin 7.3.0
25 Darwin 7.6.0
12 Darwin 7.5.0
4 Darwin 7.4.1
That's just a skosh under 1/2 of 1% of the total unique ntop users over the
last 16 days.
Perhaps Luca or one of those folk would be willing to create it...
Otherwise, sorry: "<gasp /> Use the Source, <gasp /> Luke..."
-----Burton
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stef
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ntop-Dev
Subject: Re: [Ntop] 3.1 release plans...
Any remote chance for a MacOSX "pure" binary?
Thx,
Stef
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:30:11 -0600, Burton Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OK, gang, it's time to move 3.1 out the door.
>
> Here's the plan.
>
> I will be rolling the release # to 3.0.90 today. From now on, only
> bug fixes and FAQ updates!!
>
> I will release 3.1rc1 this coming weekend, with plans for 3.1 to be
> released on the 18th of December. So TEST NOW...
>
> Luca and I will be making RC1 binary packages available based on the
> most commonly used OS/Releases in the version.xml logs.
>
> These are:
>
> Linux 16679 unique users or 70.5%
> Windows 4828 unique users, 20.4%
> FreeBSD 1826 unique users, 7.7% (almost evenly split between 4.x and
> 5.x)
>
> Within Linux, the break down is:
>
> RedHat 9 2657 11.2%
> Debian 3.1 1988 8.4%
> Fedora 2 1950 8.2%
> SuSE (all) 1944 8.2%
> Gentoo 1.4.16 1397 5.9%
> Fedora 1 1133 4.8%
> Debian 1074 4.5% (assumed to be Debian 3)
> Redhat 8 575 2.4%
> Redhat 7.3 537 2.3%
>
> (note that Gentoo is underrepresented by a couple of hundred users
> because there are a lot of trivial point releases counted separately -
> but it's still in 5th place).
>
> Being purely arbitrary and setting a 5% cutoff, that means
>
> Binary packages for
>
> Windows
> RedHat 9
> Debian 3.1
> Fedora 2
> SuSE 9.2
>
> Portage for
> Gentoo
>
> Ports for
> FreeBSD
>
> Fedora 1 and 3 people should be able to use a Fedora 2 package, and
> RH8/7.3 people should be able to use the RH9 package - you'll just
> have to run the rebuild cycle - that is:
>
> $ rpmbuild --rebuild SOURCEPKG
> (or rpmbuild --recompile SOURCEPKG)
>
> (If people want to take the release files from the cvs and create
> additional binary packages, I'll be happy to post them - contact me
> off list for
> instructions)
>
> -----Burton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop