To M. TAMON thank you for your reply My results are after 5 days of running?
Is there a way to change the bounds for the Anomalia ? I have not had any power failure or outage during this period. Thank you very much Barry Mukom TAMON wrote: >> I was pleased to see that our results appear similar. > The actual data in the sceenshots is not supposed to mean anything in > your situation. I took them at a time when most of my users were > offline. > > >> Two other unexpected results >> Packet Size: >> Shortest 42 bytes >> Average Size 452 bytes >> Longest 1,514 bytes >> Size <= 64 bytes 7.6% 178,682 >> 64 < Size <= 128 bytes 57.3% 1,344,164 >> 128 < Size <= 256 bytes 1.5% 34,816 >> 256 < Size <= 512 bytes 1.4% 33,974 >> 512 < Size <= 1024 bytes 3.9% 90,418 >> 1024 < Size <= 1518 bytes 28.3% 664,374 >> Size > 1518 bytes 0.0% 0 >> >> >> WHAT Can I set to move this more towards 256 - 512 bytes ? > I don't think it is something you do ;-) ... it is rather the quirks > in the operation of TCP/IP on the hosts and intervening L3 devices. > >> My Biggest Question is on the Network Load Statistics Graphs >> What is or causes the Yellow Anomalia ? > Whenever the trend as predicted by the graphing algorithm goes out of > the bounds of the upper and lower limits of traffic .....usually some > quirk in operation .... in my case .... always accompanies abrupt > power failure. >> Thank to you >> Barry >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >> > > > _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
