I'll comment more later if needed, but here's how I addressed a similar
situation.

- Each router at a remote site sends netflow data to an ntop server at
HQ
- ntop server is configured with 10 netflow Virtual Interfaces, 1 for
each Sales Region around the country.  Each VI listens on unique UDP
port.
- When looking for top talkers one simply looks at the region in
question and sorts on the throughput for that region.

Gotchas: configuring NAT/netflow at the routers to see traffic for each
unique private IP (LAN host) instead of the office as a whole.

G



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Nick Verdegem
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ntop] nTop Max Devices.

Thanks for your response.
I've been experimenting with this this afternoon and I don't think it
will quite do what we need.

Our infrastructure consists of 250-300 remote sites, generally assigned
a /24 subnet.  These sites come back to a series of data centres, using
a variety of thick and thin client technology. Our requirement is to be
able to identify on a site by site basis, using netflow data from the on
site router, who is using the local circuit and what they're doing.  The
original plan was to create a Virtual Interface for each /24, allowing
the support team to quickly swap VI's for each site and identify what is
going on.

I have experimented with assigning a VI with a /16 subnet, but the
filtering within nTop doesn't seem to be able to cope with wildcards,
e.g. 192.168.2.*, meaning that it becomes extremely difficult to see on
a site by site basis what is happening. 

I have also tried starting up with --local-subnets, defining each /24
that I'm monitoring, but that doesn't seem to have any effect, simply
because I believe the NetFlow probe detects this from the received flow
information anyway.

I've tried with the 'community' definitions, but I can't see a way of
searching/filtering for this, other than sorting the column under hosts.
I suspect that the 'subnet' drop down might be helpful, but all I get is
'All' or 'Unknown Subnets', and can't find a way of defining these.

There may be another way of doing it, but I cant see anything reading
MAN.  And surely we can't be the only people looking at having this
quantity of devices :)



"This email and any file attachments do not form a contract unless
expressly stated. They may contain privileged, confidential and/or
copyright information. If you are not the intended recipient or the
service provider responsible for delivering this please delete the
material from any computer and return to the sender at once; do not use,
disclose or reproduce its contents. We do not accept liability for any
error or omission in the message arising from corruption of, delay in or
interference with, its transmission. We reserve the right to monitor
email communications through normal internal and external networks. We
believe but do not warrant that the email and the file attachments are
virus free."  

Interserve Plc.  Registered in England, Number : 88456.
Registered Office: Interserve House, Ruscombe Park, Twyford, Reading,
Berkshire, RG10 9JU.

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop





<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to