OK, similar to other posts but now I've all but ruled out hardware
issues.

 

When running v3.2 on FreeBSD 6.0 I was running 3 instances of ntop with
a total of about...  20 netflow interfaces.  This was a PIII-750 and
load average and cpu was fine (50% and .5) until it ran out of memory
and started swapping.  When I upgraded to 3.3.3-8 I immediately noticed
this system could no longer keep up with the netflow load - even though
our traffic remained pretty much the same.   I messed with this for some
time disabling different features, including GeoIP - but no no avail.
So, I upgraded hardware.

 

Now I'm running Solaris 10 x86 on a VMWare VM.  I only have one instance
of ntop 3.3.10 running, but it see's everything through our core LAN -
it now has about  12,000 hosts and 20,000 sessions.  I don't know what
the physical hardware is, but the sysadmin tells me I have a single 3GHz
CPU - obviously MUCH more powerfule than a PIII-750, yet CPU util is
still > 90% and load is about 1.3.  And I still have 2 other ntop
instances to move over to this platform....

 

So, what can I do to determine what is causing such a drastic increase
in 3.3.x cpu requirements?  I guess more accurately, how can I determine
if ntop is working "correctly", or if there's a bug of some kind causing
a race condition, or maybe I linked against some library with problems?
I'm half tempted to compile v3.2 on this platform and see what happens,
but I'm guess I'll get similar results as the FreeBSD platform.

 

Any help on this would be GREATLY appreciated!  If anyone else running
3.3.8+ is monitoring a large number of hosts with many dynamic sessions,
maybe you can reply with your CPU info?  

 

Oh yea, I restarted this instance last night while traffic was low and
it was using < 10% cpu, when I came in this morning it was > 95% again.
prstat shows 8 LWP's: (1) zombie (libpcap - don't care), 6 mostly in
sleep, and one process in run and consuming 85% of the cpu.  I tried to
check this out with gdb but it's not workin too well - it's not listing
thread 1!

 

Anyway, TIA!

 

Gary

 






<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to