The standards for brilliance have dropped, apparently...
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Don Ely <[email protected]> wrote: > I had a random act of brilliance when I saw the post... :P > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:59 PM, William Robbins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I knew someone would go there. ;) >> >> >> - WJR >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Don Ely <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Can't speak to that, but make sure you have a big SAN to store all of >>> your PDF's! >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Roger Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Our company sends out PDF reports to clients, primarily via email. >>>> Questions have come up regarding the security of these reports once they >>>> are in the hands of recipients. I know we can use passwords to prevent >>>> editing but passwords create their own challenges due to typos, sharing, >>>> former employees, etc. >>>> >>>> Fortunately, we're not dealing with regulatory compliance issues but >>>> are concerned since reports contain verbiage and signatures that, if >>>> modified and/or copied for nefarious reasons, my create legal issues. >>>> We're not so concerned about preventing internal editing as much as >>>> preventing external recipients from possibly editing said documents. >>>> >>>> Is there a practical method or system that would lock a file for >>>> editing one the recipient has opened it without requiring a password? >>>> >>>> >>>> Roger Wright >>>> ___ >>>> >>>> "You can't believe most of the quotes you read on the internet." - >>>> Abraham Lincoln >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
