Only on command.

 - WJR


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]>wrote:

> They must get tired.****
>
> ** **
>
> Do they deflect as well?****
>
> ** **
>
> -sc****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:17 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] RE: Infoblox****
>
> ** **
>
> That's right! Better hurry and call now! Operators are standing, bye!****
>
> - WJR****
>
> On Jun 19, 2013 7:13 AM, "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ****
>
> **ZZZzz….snort…huh******
>
>  ****
>
> Wait, what??  Infoblox wants to make my payments??!?!****
>
>  ****
>
> -sc****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:14 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Infoblox****
>
>  ****
>
> "I know that each of us working on this ad project could buy a Tesla for
> what infoblox is charging."****
>
> This might explain -sc's new car...****
>
> - WJR****
>
> On Jun 18, 2013 8:11 PM, "Ben Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:****
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ... full grid solution for maximum ft/ha/dr/bc.
>
>   Well, it's certainly buzzword compliant.
>
> > i know that each of us working on this ad project could buy a
> > tesla for what infoblox is charging.
>
>   Apparently I'm in the wrong line of work.  :-p
>
> -- Ben****
>

Reply via email to