Thanks for the replies, gents. If anyone else has any experience with SMB3 and Hyper-V, I would sure appreciate hearing your thoughts about it.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still using iSCSI for shared storage, and shared nothing for live > migration... > > > > > > *ASB > **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>* > **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) > for the SMB market…*** > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Richard Stovall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is anyone using SMB 3 shares as shared storage for 2 (or at most 3) >> Hyper-V hosts? If so, are there any notes from the trenches about how well >> (or poorly) it works in the real world? >> >> Given the advent of shared nothing live migration between hosts, I'm >> debating whether I should go that route with DAS for my small environment, >> or consolidate the VM storage on SMB 3 shares to take advantage of the >> benefits of running clustered Hyper-V hosts. >> >> Thanks for any thoughts or comments, >> RS >> > >
