I see the error of my ways... I instead should have been calculating the odds of receiving a response commensurate with addressing "the specifics [he] was referring to."
Those clearly were very loooong odds. Silly me. -sc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Robbins Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 7:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] man-in-the-middle attack A soothing balm? - WJR On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: Hold, on... I'm trying to figure out what it'll take to mitigate the risk of damages. -sc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 6:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] man-in-the-middle attack For you? 100% -- Espi On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: What were the odds of THAT reply?!? -sc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] man-in-the-middle attack On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: That's what we've been telling you. J Whatev. -- Espi
