My sales organization would praise me forever if I deployed something like
this.

My production and IT employees would shrug and never use it.

My company owner would fire me on the spot.


On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:

> Seems like the appropriate target but I don't see it used for that
> (sharing of documents and strategies) so much...
>
> it does seem to sometimes help new folks with the "where do I find"' or
> "how do you do ??" questions.
>
> The Corp Comm folks seem to use it the most I think and as you say, that's
> their bread and butter...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Peck
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> You mean people engaged in communications and sharing of documents and
> strategies?  Seems like it hit its target market successfully.  :)
>
> Steven
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Free, Bob
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 3:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> > I guess I'm so old-fashioned that I really don't get the POINT of it
> > all, if you know what I mean
>
> Me either. It slithered in the door here through HR as a 'pilot' before
> the MS acquisition IIRC. Once it got a foothold, it couldn't be gotten rid
> of and was rolled out system wide to anyone who wanted it. I jokingly call
> it cockroach software.
>
> Seems to be most popular with the HR, Marketing and Training type folks
> here.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 6:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> Not quite sure how to answer the question. :)
>
> It's a twitter+FB for the enterprise.  It seems to work fine. I guess I'm
> so old-fashioned that I really don't get the POINT of it all, if you know
> what I mean.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 1:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> What do you think of Yammer?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> Oh!
>
> Heck, I really don't know.
>
> I've only integrated the "most recent" versions of everything: Exchange
> 2013, Lync 2013, SharePoint 2013, Yammer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
>
> Uhhh.....
>
> Where "it" is Yammer, BTW...
>
> Kurt
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Does it integrate with 2010, or do we need to migrate to 2013?
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> By the way, this was purchased by MSFT after Lync 2010 was released
> (originally a 3rd party product). It is built-in to Lync 2013 (called
> Persistent Chat there).
> >>
> >> It comes in VERY handy.
> >>
> >> Although for "true" enterprise social media, you should take a look at
> Microsoft's release of Yammer, and how it integrates with Exchange and Lync.
> >>
> >> (Or NewsGator, if you want to consider non-Microsoft solutions.)
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 7:50 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
> >>
> >> Well, holy moly - look at that!
> >>
> >> Something that isn't in my Lync Server 2010 Unleashed book - why am I
> not surprised?
> >>
> >> Thanks very much - I'll definitely have a look at it..
> >>
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Michael B. Smith <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Uh.... Lync Group Chat?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=12480
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 7:15 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: [NTSysADM] Perhaps something to supplement Lync
> >>>
> >>> We've got Lync 2010 Standard installed and running internally with IM
> and video conferencing. At some point we'll start to federate, but an
> engineering manager wants more, because we've got staff in Redmond and
> Brisbane, and are working with a firm in Toronto.
> >>>
> >>> Here's what he thinks he's looking for
> >>>
> >>>      We communicate with [outside firm] in Cananda, devs upstairs and
> >>>      marketing in the work cells downstairs, with individuals in
> Australia,
> >>>      and need to be able to create permanent chat room (or their
> equivalent)
> >>>      with joinable membership. These rooms need to enable synchronous
> >>>      and asynchronous capabilities so those coming later can see the
> >>>      thread of what has been said and add to it. Think of it as a
> Jabber
> >>>      server. Lync does 1-1, not sure if it does many to many, and if
> it does
> >>>      whether the participants have to be re-added for each interaction
> (not
> >>>      good). This is a key collaboration tool that is needed. Right now
> we
> >>>      rely on email and it is clunky: we have to remember to add or
> remove
> >>>      people etc. Also, Jabber allows for private conversation within
> the chat
> >>>      room. This will also help those who are sick and can't come in to
> >>>      interact with the rest of the team.
> >>>
> >>> While Lync does do some of this, it doesn't seem to fit the rest of
> his requirements, and I'm not sure what would.
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone have recommendations for what he wants? Bonus points if it
> integrates with Lync, of course.
> >>>
> >>> Kurt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> PG&E is committed to protecting our customers' privacy.
> To learn more, please visit
> http://www.pge.com/about/company/privacy/customer/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> PG&E is committed to protecting our customers' privacy.
> To learn more, please visit
> http://www.pge.com/about/company/privacy/customer/
>
>
>

Reply via email to