Can you say Javascript?

I knew you could...

Kurt

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>wrote:

>  You can copy chrome’s sqlite db wherever you want it, if you have a way
> to copy files from the source computer.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Alex Eckelberry
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 7, 2013 7:43 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Google Chrome stores passwords in plaintext****
>
> ** **
>
> >But you can get it without physical access...  that's the point.****
>
> ** **
>
> Really?  I didn’t see that.   ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Andrew S. Baker
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 7, 2013 3:03 PM
> *To:* ntsysadm
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Google Chrome stores passwords in plaintext****
>
> ** **
>
> But you can get it without physical access...  that's the point.****
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:****
>
>  Saw that. Not sure how much I care, as it’s been said many times once
> you give up physical access all bets are off. As the Chrome guy says “We
> want to be very clear that when you grant someone access to your OS user
> account, that they can get at everything”.****
>
>  ****
>
> Dave****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Micheal Espinola Jr
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:22 AM****
>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Google Chrome stores passwords in plaintext****
>
>  ****
>
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/07/google-chrome-password-security-flaw
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> No obfuscation to the casual snooper, no master password, no nothing.
>  This is the same thing that Firefox caught flack for 3 years ago.****
>
>
> ****
>
> --
> Espi****
>
>  ****
>
>  ** **
>

Reply via email to