In Seattle, and probably other places as well, you can often find good
used equipment at places like Re-PC and 3R Technology.

Kurt

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:49 AM, N Parr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Look at an older precision workstations, they have pretty much the same guts
> as servers.  I’m running T5400’s at home with 24GB and dual quad core 2GHz
> Xeons.  Can be found pretty cheap on ebay.  Last one I picked up was around
> $300 a year ago.  They use the same RAM as Poweredge 2900’s.
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Looking for Hyper-V server hardware
>
>
>
> I’d think whiteboxing would not be viable since a Xeon proc and 32GB of RAM
> will just about consume your $500 right off the bat.
>
>
>
> Why does it have to be a Xeon? A quad core i5 whitebox might be doable for
> $500.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of David Lum
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NTSysADM] Looking for Hyper-V server hardware
>
>
>
> My old home lab PowerEdge 840 server is giving me issues so I’m looking to
> upgrade, looking to spend ~500 (can be used, obviously!). Ideally I’d like a
> tower server populated with 32GB RAM. I’m not picky on brand (partial to
> Dell because that’s what my clients run, but not a requirement) but do want
> Xeon instead of the AMD equivalent.  The closest I can find is a Dell T300
> populated with 24GB RAM for about $500 shipped, which would work (the 840
> has only 8GB RAM!).
>
>
>
> Since this is for my home lab I don’t mind building a white box system
> either. Suggestions anyone? Dell Outlet prices are out of my price range…
>
>
>
> ·         Tower
>
> ·         Xeon proc
>
> ·         24+GB installed
>
> ·         HDD’s / optical drive not necessary, I have my own
>
> David Lum
> Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM
> Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764
>
>


Reply via email to