Yeah, we already have a 2008 R2 and a 2012 dc in the subdomain. For rhe items 
you listed I simply created GPO's for each and applied them one at a time until 
the GPO's replicated what a 2008 R2 environment woyld look like, and then I 
stood up a 2008 R2 DC.

Dave

On Aug 30, 2013, at 6:58 AM, "Christopher Bodnar" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

We are in the process of doing this. Outside of the procedural items you 
outlined, have you looked into the other possible issues you may run into 
(besides the CS stuff)? Here is the list that I have been using for our 
environment:

1.        LanMan Hash:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946405

2.        SMB signing (UNIX? )
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731654.aspx


3.        LmCompatibilityLevel
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc960646.aspx

By default the new setting on 2008 R2 will take this setting from a 2 to a 3.


4.        5000 attributes in LDAP response

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-US;2009267

http://blogs.technet.com/b/qzaidi/archive/2010/09/02/override-the-hardcoded-ldap-query-limits-introduced-in-windows-server-2008-and-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx


5.        For other operating system implementations (such as Netapp, Samba, 
EMC, etc), it is strongly suggested to contact those vendors to get their 
supportability matrix for Windows as client and as DC.

6.        SSL connections to the nodes by using the alias name from an LDAPS 
client http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2275950
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2282241


7.        Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 and later operating systems use 
a higher range of ports for outgoing connections than previous versions of 
Windows. The new default start port is 49152, and the default end port is 
65535. This is a change from the configuration of earlier versions of Windows 
that used a default port range of 1025 through 5000. If you receive errors 
indicating that “the endpoint mapper is out of endpoints,” especially after 
retiring domain controllers that run Windows 2000 or Windows Server 2003, you 
might need to reconfigure firewalls and routers to use the new default port 
range. For more information, see article 929851 
(http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=153117).

8.        See Microsoft Security Advisory (937811) 
(http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=164559) and article 976918 in the 
Microsoft Knowledge Base (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=178251 ).

9.        .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 or earlier:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-US;2260240
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise Architecture 
and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
[email protected]<mailto:>


<mime-attachment.jpg>

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com<http://www.guardianlife.com/>








From:        David Lum <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To:        "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date:        08/29/2013 05:39 PM
Subject:        [NTSysADM] Upgrade 2003 DC's
Sent by:        
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________



So… in my environment we have four ancient DC’s. Two root DC’s and two of five 
subdomain DC’s. These have been around enough and our environment is complex 
enough that we aren’t sure how many systems rely in the specific IP or hostname.

Seems to me it should be fairly straightforward to stand up new with same 
name/IP as the originals:

•         Transfer all FSMO roles
•         Demote DC (DCRPOMO)
•         Unjoin from domain
•         Power off
•         Build new server with same name
•         Join to domain
•         Install AD DS roles
•         DCPROMO
•         Transfer FSMO roles back (optional)

Now in one case the DC is also a certificate server, although we aren’t 100% 
sure if/how it’s being used. Surely there are some caveats to consider?
David Lum
Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764

----------------------------------------- This message, and any attachments to 
it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, 
copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

<<inline: ATT00001.jpg>>

Reply via email to