I shall peruse that as well.

Thanks.

Kurt


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Christopher Bodnar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Have you tried changing option 67 to:
>
> boot\x86\wdsnbp.com
>
> Per this KB article?
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766320(v=ws.10).aspx
>
>
>  *Christopher Bodnar*
> Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
> Architecture and Engineering Services  Tel 610-807-6459
> 3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
> [email protected]
>
>
> *
> The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America*
> *
> **www.guardianlife.com* <http://www.guardianlife.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:        Kurt Buff <[email protected]>
> To:        [email protected]
> Date:        09/25/2013 05:22 PM
> Subject:        Re: [NTSysADM] Issue with WDS
> Sent by:        [email protected]
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> option 67 - boot.wim  <<-- this works just fine.
> option 66 - FQDN of server and/or IP address of server <<-- neither worked
> when client wasn't on same subnet as WDS server. FQDN worked when client on
> same subnet.
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Christopher Bodnar <*
> [email protected]* <[email protected]>> wrote:
> What is your DHCP Option 67 set to?
>
>   *Christopher Bodnar*
> Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
> Architecture and Engineering Services  Tel *610-807-6459* <610-807-6459>
> 3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
> [email protected]
>  *
>
> The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America**
> **
> **www.guardianlife.com* <http://www.guardianlife.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:        Kurt Buff <*[email protected]* <[email protected]>>
> To:        *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> Date:        09/25/2013 03:17 PM
> Subject:        Re: [NTSysADM] Issue with WDS
> Sent by:        
> *[email protected]*<[email protected]>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> We have DHCP helpers on our layer3 swtich. The client gets the DHCP
> settings in its subnet, and then tries to communicate with the WDS
> server. If that WDS server is in a different subnet than the client,
> the tftp request fails. It probably doesn't help that the client, DHCP
> server and WDS server are all on different subnets.
>
> In fact, placing the client and the WDS server on the same subnet
> fixed the problem.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Mayo, Bill 
> <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> > I know that in the Cisco switch environment, you have to use the "dhcp
> helper" command for the WDS server when crossing subnets.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: *[email protected]* <[email protected]>[
> *mailto:[email protected]* <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:32 PM
> > To: *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Issue with WDS
> >
> > Haven't done it before. Been more server/network focused, but JA got the
> bug, and I encouraged him to try, so some of the troubleshooting fell to me.
> >
> > Pretty cool technology, but he's got some work to do in putting the
> driver packs together. Better him than me...
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Art DeKneef 
> > <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >> It can be done if I remember correctly when I did this for a school
> district over 5 years ago.
> >>
> >> But all of my latest installs have been for SMBs and have been on the
> same subnet.
> >>
> >> Just started setting up an installation of WDS on Server 2012 R2 today.
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> >> [
> *mailto:[email protected]* <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:07 PM
> >> To: *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Issue with WDS
> >>
> >> It's an initial install of WDS.
> >>
> >> Turns out the problem goes away if WDS server and client are in the
> same subnet.
> >>
> >> I did some googling regarding tftp across different subnets, and did
> see some entries regarding reg entries, but none regarding hotfixes.
> >> I'll pursue that if we want to keep clients and server on different
> subnets.
> >>
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Art DeKneef 
> >> <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >>> Has it worked before and doesn't with this machine or is this the
> first time?
> >>>
> >>> Is the DHCP server initialized and authorized?
> >>>
> >>> Have all the WDS hotfixes been applied? There are some that pertain to
> TFTP if memory serves me.
> >>>
> >>> Just a couple of thoughts off the top of my head.
> >>>
> >>> Art
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: *[email protected]*<[email protected]>
> >>> [
> *mailto:[email protected]* <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:47 PM
> >>> To: *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: [NTSysADM] Issue with WDS
> >>>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> Junior admin is having problems making this go.
> >>>
> >>> Config looks good to me after cursory inspection, but I've found an
> error message being emitted by the WDS server to the laptop, which looks
> like this:
> >>>
> >>> IP 192.168.9.10.69 > 192.168.24.69.2070:  22 ERROR EBADOP "Access
> violation."
> >>>
> >>> This looks like a TFTP error from what I've found via Google.
> >>>
> *http://www.mwat.de/docs/tftp/w4/tftp/Tftp.html#EBADOP*<http://www.mwat.de/docs/tftp/w4/tftp/Tftp.html#EBADOP>
>
> >>>
> >>> The laptop is a Dell E6420.
> >>>
> >>> The WDS server is a 2008R2 VM at 192.168.9.10, as shown above, and the
> DHCP server is one of our DCs, also 2008R2, on the 
> *192.168.10.0/24*<http://192.168.10.0/24>subnet.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone seen anything like this and can give me a clue?
> >>>
> >>> Kurt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------- This message, and any
> attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
> message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
> ----------------------------------------- This message, and any
> attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
> message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>

<<image/jpeg>>

<<image/jpeg>>

Reply via email to