While the shop is a small one, it seems somewhat inconclusive to me that is
only a single server in the environment, vs it being only one server that
all that attacking was against.

Either way, larger environments have the benefit of log correlation
solutions and a more extensive trail that can be made to get to the
important systems.  Size works against both parties.





*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market…***




On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Article implies they have all of one server... ****
>
> Props to them for doing root cause analysis, but when you have that many
> eyes watching one box, then life’s a lot easier then when you have 100+
> boxes you need to watch****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers****
>
> Ken****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ziots, Edward
> *Sent:* Friday, 4 October 2013 10:03 PM
> *To:* [email protected]; COMPUTING
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Vigilance and planning save the day****
>
> ** **
>
> Good article. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Z****
>
> ** **
>
> Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, Security +, Network +****
>
> Security Engineer****
>
> Lifespan Organization****
>
> [email protected]****
>
> Work:401-255-2497****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this
> message, but are not the intended recipient, nor an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from copying, printing,
> forwarding or otherwise disseminating this communication. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
> by replying to the message. Then, delete the message from your computer.
> Thank you.****
>
> *[image: Description: Description: Lifespan]*
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Andrew S. Baker
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 03, 2013 6:44 PM
> *To:* COMPUTING
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Vigilance and planning save the day****
>
> ** **
>
> Finally, a pretty good security incident response story...
>
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/how-vigilance-saved-a-startup-from-a-sophisticated-robbery-7000021436/
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
> ** **
>

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to