Too big - he's about 5'10", and weighs perhaps 350.

Kurt

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:10 AM, John Matteson <[email protected]> wrote:
> And of course you have a good place to hide the body?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 12:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: AU bandwidth
>
> I found the rogue DHCP server.
>
> I had a report this morning as soon as I got in from a user who couldn't 
> connect to anything, and found that he had an address in the
> 192.168.1.0/24 subnet, on a VLAN that should be in the 192.168.13.0/24 subnet.
>
> Brought in a laptop, changed its IP address to match the range of the rogue 
> unit and connected it to a port on a switch in the same VLAN, and pinged the 
> IP address of the rogue server, then harvested the MAC address from 'arp -a'
>
> Then did a 'sho mac' on the switches that carried the VLAN, and nailed it 
> down to the port on the switch.
>
> I disabled the port, and let the user come to me, asking why he couldn't get 
> anywhere.
>
> The rest is politics...
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If you find them just kill their ports and say their rogue equipment
>> caused a hardware failure and you need to replace all the hardware in
>> or near their device.  Pass it onto their managers with a bill for the
>> equipment.  Pretty sure they will get the blood drained and your hands will 
>> be semi-clean.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:16:42 -0700
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: AU bandwidth
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>>
>>> That's a good list to start. Much appreciated.
>>>
>>> If I follow up, it'll be in a few days - among other things, I have
>>> to track down the miscreants (again!) who are putting up rogue
>>> network equipment on the production network that is issuing DHCP
>>> responses, and that thinks it's root bridge.
>>>
>>> I'm out for blood this time.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:37 PM, James Hill
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > You can get unmetered here but it is more expensive. It depends on
>>> > where exactly. Brisbane city for example would be no problem to
>>> > provide the speed and symmetrical link you want. Out in the suburbs
>>> > may be more challenging though.
>>> >
>>> > Telstra is the biggest (and usually most expensive provider) ISP
>>> > here followed by Optus.
>>> >
>>> > There are plenty of others that resell the above two networks and
>>> > also in some cases have a fair amount of their own equipment. Any
>>> > of the following will be able to provide what you are after:-
>>> >
>>> > http://www.telstra.com.au/business-enterprise/
>>> > http://www.optus.com.au/business
>>> > http://www.brennanit.com.au/
>>> > http://www.overthewire.com.au/
>>> >
>>> > Contact me off list if you need anything more specific.
>>> >
>>> > James.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: [email protected]
>>> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 9:22 AM
>>> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> > Subject: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: AU bandwidth
>>> >
>>> > Specifically, Brisbane, if any of you have experience there, I'd be
>>> > happy to hear about it.
>>> >
>>> > We've got an office there, and I've been trying to get decent
>>> > bandwidth there for ages.
>>> >
>>> > I'm looking for a plan with greater than 4mbit (preferably 10mbit),
>>> > and no metering. No SDSL, either.
>>> >
>>> > EFM, fiber, something that will get me a /29 and reliable
>>> > connectivity that we can pound on for the site-to-site VPN back to
>>> > the US office at a reasonable price.
>>> >
>>> > I did another search today, and *everyone* wants to see you metered
>>> > bandwitdh, and AFAIAC, the only metering should be the actual speed
>>> > of the link - I pay for it, I get it, all the way, 24x7.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Anyone on this list know of a good provider there?
>>> >
>>> > Kurt
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to