Yes… however I've yet to dig in to locate the info. But I will on Monday.






Sent from Lenovo Tablet 2





From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: ‎Saturday‎, ‎October‎ ‎19‎, ‎2013 ‎12‎:‎05‎ ‎PM
To: '[email protected]'





Sure - complaints from people who manipulate SEO, but is there evidence that it 
is making searching less effective and/or is financially manipulating results?




--
Espi

 



On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:




Its widely reported, but this is the 2nd such Google change in the last year. 
The last change was secretly rolled out. Results changed, search traffic 
dropped off all over the web, and after complaints Google finally admitted to 
implementing the “hummingbird” algorithm. Read up on the complaints over 
hummingbird.







Sent from Lenovo Tablet 2





From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 12:21 AM
To: '[email protected]'






So, your SEO manipulations aren't working as intended anymore - but how does 
that translate into Google results not being accurate/relevant?




--
Espi

 




On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:






Yep… I'll have to dig it up and send the link. We have several web sites where 
search results tanked since January and have been working to recover only to 
find out that SEO optimization isn't working anymore.







Sent from Lenovo Tablet 2





From: Richard Stovall
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:44 PM
To: '[email protected]'








Not that I disbelieve you, but do you have any specific documentation for that 
statement?



That seems like a very specific claim whereas most SEO stuff is pretty nebulous.





On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:50 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:






Google recently changed their algorithm again where they push sites higher in 
the results that Google makes more ad revenue from.






Sent from Lenovo Tablet 2





From: Jon Harris
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:19 PM
To: '[email protected]'









You might try using Bing you might get some usable results.  Google has not 
been my friend on these type of researches.
 
Jon
 


Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:16:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] More PowerShell
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]


Hmmm, bummer. I thought I was just getting hit by a lot of Google-chaff because 
every link I could find simply talks about creating an executable from a PS 
script, which is obviously not what I want. Rather frustrating when you know 
it's possible because I've got code that works but can't use it :-(




On 18 October 2013 14:02, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:




I’ve got 3 different ways of doing this, all work for hire (which means it 
can’t be shared). I don’t know of anyone that did this and placed it in the 
public domain. If you find one, let me know too. J

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 7:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] More PowerShell



 


A guy I knew once gave me a bit of PowerShell which would compile an executable 
on an endpoint. The executable did nothing except run for a couple of seconds 
and then exit, which was exactly what I needed.


 


Unfortunately I am now putting together a blog post which utilizes this handy 
function but the guy who wrote it is unwilling for me to use his code, even 
with a credit. So I thought I'd Google about and try and find my own way of 
doing it.....but I can't find anything I can make head or tail of.


 


Can anyone point me in the direction of some PS that can do this sort of thing, 
so I can put together my own bit of code for the blog post?


 


Cheers,


 






 

-- 
James Rankin
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk





-- 
James Rankin
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

Reply via email to