...Looks like I'm way behind...

http://techreport.com/review/25559/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-200tb-update


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew W. Ross
[mailto:[email protected]]
To: [email protected]
Sent:
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:01:20 -0800
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Hard drive failure
rate


> In case people haven't seen this:
> 
> http://techreport.com/review/25320/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-22tb-update
> 
> They've taken several ~250GB SSDs and have written 22TBs of data to them so
> far. They plan on doing another update when they hit 100TB of writes.
> 
> So far, so good...
> 
> 
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ben Scott
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, 12
> Nov 2013 08:30:24 -0800
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Hard drive failure rate
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Chenault <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Interesting read and on-topic for pretty much all of us.
> > >
> >
> http://www.extremetech.com/computing/170748-how-long-do-hard-drives-actually-live-for
> > 
> >   TL;DR version: Bathtub curve, as expected.  :-)
> > 
> >   And here I call witness to The Third Universal Truth of Information
> > Technology, which so wisely tells us: "Storage fails."
> > 
> >   (http://www.trioptimum.com/truth/)
> > 
> > -- Ben
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to