Thanks Brad.  This is exactly what I was running into on these servers.


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Brad DeHart <[email protected]> wrote:

>  We experienced this issue recently as well.  The Virtual Machine Queues
> (VMQ) feature seems to have some issues with Broadcom NICs.  On all of the
> physical adapters, in the adapter configuration, disable the Virtual
> Machine Queues feature.  It is in the Advanced tab.  That took us from huge
> latency spikes back to solid, sub 1ms latency.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jim Majorowicz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 4, 2013 4:44 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Possible Network issue with 2012 R2 Hyper-V
>
>
>
> Jim,
>
>
>
> I'll take a look at those settings here tomorrow.  What I figured out this
> afternoon is that is something to do with the Virtual Switch or NIC on the
> VM itself.  Connectivity to the Host PC which uses the IP assigned to the
> Hyper-V Virtual Switch works just fine, but a PING to the VM will regularly
> come back with times in the hundreds of MS rather than 1 or less.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kennedy, Jim <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>  I had similar issues with one of our 2012 hyper-v servers. The other is
> always fine and the 208 R2 ones are always fine.  Some of the NICs would
> flip to ‘unknown’ networks. This certainly caused disconnects.
>
>
>
> I hit the below with gpedit and force it to private.
>
>
>
> Computer Configuration | Windows Settings | Security Setting | Network
> List Manager Policies
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jim Majorowicz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:54 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Possible Network issue with 2012 R2 Hyper-V
>
>
>
> I just installed a new server with a client and they appear to be
> experiencing some Network Latency issues as in files take seconds to open,
> the PC will frequently kick themselves into "Offline" mode, and there are
> so many components in play I'm little hesitant as to even know where to
> start, so if you all can help point me in the right direction....
>
>
>
> New Server:
>
> Dell PE T320
>
> 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit NICs (Onboard) Set in a Team.
>
> Virtual Ethernet Adaptor Switch configured with static IP used to connect
> to Host box.
>
>
>
> Connected Switch:  (I do not manage this switch, and the company that does
> will no longer support.)
>
> Sprint 6124SX3
>
> (connected to two ports)
>
>
>
> Fibre to two other Sprint switches in another part of the building.  All
> of this will be replaced when the new Phone system is put in.
>
>
>
> The PCs are all connected to the network *THROUGH* the added port on the
> Shoretel VoIP phone.  Nothing with the phone system has been updated in
> over 5 years.
>
>
>
> I used the Windows 2012 R2 Hyper-V Best Practices Checklist from the blog
> to setup the server and pretty much just went with the default settings.
>
>
>
> Internet is a slow antiquated partial T1, soon to be replaced.
>
>
>
> How do I figure out what is causing the access lag?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:
>
> This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain
> business proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a
> specific individual and purpose. This information is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity named above. The authorized recipient of
> this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any
> other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required
> to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
> contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange
> for the return or destruction of these documents.
>

Reply via email to