Surely I'm being surly.

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] RE: To trunk or lacp
> 
> Surely you are being strictly figurative.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven M. Caesare
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] RE: To trunk or lacp
> 
> > And yes, I'm just being silly.  :)
> 
> Well, literally, you are being pedantic.
> 
> -sc
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Scott
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 11:58 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: To trunk or lacp
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Michael Leone
<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> I literally (as in about an hour ago) configured ...
> > >>
> > >>   That word, "literally"... I do not think it means what you
think
> it means.
> > >
> > > So yes, I "literally" had just finished enabling/using LACP on the
> > > distributed switch ...
> >
> >   Sure, but you didn't write "just".  ;-)  You what you wrote
> > (literally) says you literally configured them.  Well, I guess it's
> good you're not
> > making it up.  ;-)
> >
> >   And yes, I'm just being silly.  :)
> >
> > -- Ben
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to