Really? I did not know that!
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 17:38, "Michael B. Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Welll…… > > If you need that mailbox > > You can restore the entire mailbox db > > And then restore and/or search a single mailbox inside of that db > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] DPM, Exchange, brick-level restore > > I did not set up these jobs so cannot speak to how they were done. > > I see no other mailboxes at all. > > I think I'll destroy the existing group and rebuild it as you say. > > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] DPM, Exchange, brick-level restore > Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:08:13 +0000 > > Hi Daniel—We’re using DPM 2012 (not R2 yet) on WS08 R2, so not an exact > match, but close. You mention the volume, but not the Exchange backup > options, so I’m wondering if you have the right type of backup set, or > options installed? Do you see any other mailboxes when searching to restore? > > Our new system is an Exchange 2013 DAG, and we had to do a couple of things > to support it with DPM. First is to install Exchange tools on the DPM > server, and then when creating the protection group, you select the Exchange > node (All Exchange Storage groups), rather than a disk volume. In the case > of a DAG, I connect via the DAG name when selecting the DBs to back up, > rather than each individual server. > > -Bonnie > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [NTSysADM] DPM, Exchange, brick-level restore > > Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard > System Center 2012 R2 DPM > > Attempting to do a mailbox restore. > DPM/Recovery/Select appropriate DB/Select "Exchange Mailboxes" > Put in search parameter for a mailbox I know is in that DB and click Search. > > No matching items were found. > > The only thing I can think of is that the volume being backed up is a dynamic > volume on the SAN rather than fixed. I'm not finding any kind of > documentation that calls this out as an issue but I see no other explanation. > > Can anyone clarify please?
