Uhhhh.....

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

Beware.

In particular, just because there aren't two physical NICs doesn't
mean that the host isn't multi-homed...

It might be OK, but that's not the way I'd bet.

Kurt

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Datum Guru <[email protected]> wrote:
> Those are all multihomed configurations. I was asking for 2 IP's in the same
> subnet on the same NIC.
>
> I guess failing to find anything that discourages this configurations means
> there are not negatives.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Don't know if these still apply, but take a look at the referenced KB
>> articles here:
>>
>> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/a1583d7f-fa59-4497-89de-666d683e53a0/can-dc-be-multihomed-in-windows-2008-server
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Datum Guru <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > If everything was DHCP that would be ideal. What if there are many
>> > devices
>> > that have static IP info assigned.
>> >
>> > Is there any known issues with multiple IP's on domain controllers?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> IMHO, it's simpler to shorten the DHCP lease time to something like 4
>> >> hours, update the scope or global options in DHCP to reflect the new
>> >> DCs settings and let the two DCs coexist for a few days, then demote
>> >> the old one.
>> >>
>> >> Kurt
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Datum Guru <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Are there any negatives to adding a second IP address (in the same
>> >> > subnet)
>> >> > to a single NIC on a domain controller?
>> >> >
>> >> > The theory is there will be a "DNS Server IP." This is the IP that
>> >> > will
>> >> > be
>> >> > set as the DNS server on static assignments and what DHCP hands out.
>> >> >
>> >> > Example:
>> >> > Assume AD integrated DNS and all domain controller have DNS
>> >> > installed.
>> >> > The DNS Server IP: 192.168.1.5
>> >> >
>> >> > Domain controller DC-1 has the IP 192.168.1.10 and the additional IP
>> >> > 192.168.1.5.
>> >> >
>> >> > When I want to retire DC-1 I would promote a new domain controller
>> >> > DC-2
>> >> > which would have the IP 192.168.1.20. When both domain controllers
>> >> > have
>> >> > fully replicated and are functioning correctly I would remove the
>> >> > second
>> >> > IP
>> >> > (192.168.1.5) from DC-1 and add it as a second IP to DC-2.
>> >> >
>> >> > At this point there is still 2 domain controllers functioning but DNS
>> >> > clients that are pointing to 192.168.1.5 are using the new DC-2.
>> >> >
>> >> > Demoting the first DC-1 should not negatively effect any device after
>> >> > that.
>> >> > There is no moving IPs from computer to computer or renaming
>> >> > computers.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have done much googling and have not found an answer to this
>> >> > question.
>> >> > This is not multi-homed, everything is on the same subnet, and there
>> >> > is
>> >> > only
>> >> > 1 NIC in each DC.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to