It's plumbing.  It's never easy.

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:33 PM, William Robbins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Garbage disposal.  Should be easy...right?  ;)
>
>
> - WJR
> 🙈🙉🙊
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Which project were you repairing?
>>
>>
>>
>> -sc
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins
>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 12:00 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt
>>
>>
>>
>> Agreed. I should probably have been more verbose than my "Maybe?" but I
>> was in the midst of a home repair project.  ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> - WJR
>> 🙈🙉🙊
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:46 PM, William Robbins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Maybe?
>> http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/06/01/1922248/the-sudden-policy-change-in-truecrypt-explained
>>
>>   Slashdot is linking to a blog that's quoting Twitter posts that
>> appear to be incoherent speculation. (I think.  It's hard to tell with
>> Twitter.)
>>
>>   Anyway, as I read it, the speculation is that this is a warrant
>> canary.  Except... it can't be.
>>
>>   The issue arises because the gov't can serve you with a warrant or
>> other legal instrument that includes a gag order preventing you from
>> even talking about it.
>>
>>   A "warrant canary" is some thing you preemptively maintain as a
>> countermeasure to such.  You announce you're maintaining this canary.
>> Then, if you get served, you stop maintaining the canary. The classic
>> example is a daily announcement "We haven't received a warrant".  The
>> day you don't post that, everyone knows you just got served.[1]
>>
>>   Suddenly yanking the project, without explanation or previously
>> established meaning, is not a warrant canary.  It might be what
>> happens when you don't *have* a warrant canary, but that's the exact
>> opposite meaning of the term.
>>
>>   So... <shrug>
>>
>> -- Ben
>>
>> [1] The theory is, the gov't can prevent you from saying "I've been
>> served with a warrant", but can't force you to speak untruth.  Whether
>> that actually works in reality, I have no idea.
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to