C'mon, I live in TN...we just run the pipe out the back door into the yard. ;)
- WJR ๐๐๐ On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Maglinger, Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > Only if you upgrade your drain pipe and sewer as well. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins > *Sent:* Monday, June 02, 2014 3:48 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > Yeah, but the new one doubles as a wood chipper... > > > > - WJR > ๐๐๐ > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Jonathan Link <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ought to be enough for anybody. > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 1/3rd HP that isโฆ > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steven M. Caesare > > > *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 2:33 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > Lovely. > > > > When mine went, and I pulled it out, it was a 1/3rd unit. Apparently they > donโt even SELL units that smallโฆ it had to have been a real โbuilderโs > grade specialโ that was nice and cheapโฆ > > > > So was a new one leaking thru the housing?? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *William Robbins > *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 2:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > Aye. New mounting system as well. The old one had 13 years to get well > settled in too. > > > > - WJR > > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Erk. > > > > New unit?? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins > *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 12:41 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > 6 hours...and in the end, it leaks like a sieve. Through the disposal > housing, not the piping. > > > > - WJR > ๐๐๐ > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Having done a coupleโฆ. Nope. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins > *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 12:34 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > Garbage disposal. Should be easy...right? ;) > > > > - WJR > ๐๐๐ > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Which project were you repairing? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William Robbins > *Sent:* Monday, June 2, 2014 12:00 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Hmmm.... TrueCrypt > > > > Agreed. I should probably have been more verbose than my "Maybe?" but I > was in the midst of a home repair project. ;) > > > > - WJR > ๐๐๐ > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:46 PM, William Robbins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Maybe? > http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/06/01/1922248/the-sudden-policy-change-in-truecrypt-explained > > Slashdot is linking to a blog that's quoting Twitter posts that > appear to be incoherent speculation. (I think. It's hard to tell with > Twitter.) > > Anyway, as I read it, the speculation is that this is a warrant > canary. Except... it can't be. > > The issue arises because the gov't can serve you with a warrant or > other legal instrument that includes a gag order preventing you from > even talking about it. > > A "warrant canary" is some thing you preemptively maintain as a > countermeasure to such. You announce you're maintaining this canary. > Then, if you get served, you stop maintaining the canary. The classic > example is a daily announcement "We haven't received a warrant". The > day you don't post that, everyone knows you just got served.[1] > > Suddenly yanking the project, without explanation or previously > established meaning, is not a warrant canary. It might be what > happens when you don't *have* a warrant canary, but that's the exact > opposite meaning of the term. > > So... <shrug> > > -- Ben > > [1] The theory is, the gov't can prevent you from saying "I've been > served with a warrant", but can't force you to speak untruth. Whether > that actually works in reality, I have no idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
