InfoBlox has great reporting. They also offered redundant/failover DHCP for many years before Windows did.
It also simplifies the deployment of DNSSEC and IPv6 DNS (in terms, primarily, of the creation of reverse lookup zones) ☺ That’s all I see – one man’s opinion. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kuhlman, Donald Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 5:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Infoblox vs. native Windows InfoBlox very Expensive compared to the Windows alternative. The last gig I was at was going the opposite way due to the high cost and lack of any exceptional features. Don K From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Rankin Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 3:59 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Infoblox vs. native Windows They had it at a company I worked for recently. Can't say I noticed a difference in anything. On 25 June 2014 21:50, Daniel Chenault <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: A proposal is floating around here about ditching native DHCP and DNS on Windows server in favor of Infoblox. Looking for pros/cons, comments, experiences please. -- James Rankin --------------------- RCL - Senior Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS) | The Virtualization Practice Analyst - Desktop Virtualization http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
