Greatly appreciated

Will report back in the am.

Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:18:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RDP to xpmode instance
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Internal is a network that only the VMs can access.  Share NAT is obvious.  The 
"Realtek PCI" is the one you want.  That gives your VM direct access to the 
hosts NIC.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:51 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote:




I have the options "internal" "shared nat" & realtek  pci

I don't see "bridged mode " per SE but neither internal or shared nat allow me 
to get access to it.




  

Jean-Paul Natola

 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] RDP to xpmode instance
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 15:04:25 -0400




tried that , didnt work. I believe its the nic mode (Nat vs Bridge) i will 
report back once i get back to the site.

thanks

  

Jean-Paul Natola

 


> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:59:29 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]

> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RDP to xpmode instance
> 
> change the nic ip to match the parent ip range
> 
> On 7/12/2014 7:36 AM, J- P wrote:
> > its a soho , no server/domain
> >

> >
> > Jean-Paul Natola
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:35:22 -0700
> > > From: [email protected]

> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RDP to xpmode instance
> > >
> > > Join it to the domain.

> > >
> > > Susan Bradley
> > > Meet up with me, Amy, Philip and Jeremy at the Brain Explosion in 
> > Florida this September. I'll be talking about protecting your network

> > > http://www.thirdtier.net/brain-explosion/
> > >
> > > On 7/11/2014 8:38 PM, J- P wrote:
> > > > Hi all,

> > > >
> > > > Out of the box windows xpmode install on a new win 7 pro pc all
> > > > default settings accepted- RDP enabled on both the XPMode guest, and
> > > > the WIN7 Host-

> > > >
> > > > What do i need to modify to allow rdp connections to the XPMode 
> > guest ?
> > > > tried with firewalls enabled and disabled
> > > >
> > > > thanks,

> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 
                                                                                
  




                                          

Reply via email to