But there was content that was better than standard def available, and there was hardware available (DVD players) that could upscale into 720ish (HD) territory. I'm not knocking 4K, but I think there is a difference between then and now in terms of where the industry is at, and whats available for actually using the new tech. The 4K push by TV manufacturers seems premature imho.
-- Espi On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: > The same was true of 1080p for some time. > > > > 4K delivery with 10-15Mbps is a reality. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Micheal Espinola Jr > *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 4:37 PM > > *To:* ntsysadm > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] RE: move hdd with windows 7 on it > > > > The problem being that the content does exist at any reasonable scale. > Not even web scale, although thats what Samsung's big push is. I hope > your bandwidth is up to the challenge. > > > -- > Espi > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Although most of my confusion still lays on the early adopters of > >> 4K. Even people in the vfx world here in LA dont understand why > >> consumers would buy it [yet] - and these are people that work > >> with it professionally. > > > > > I've seen it and I'm a believer. > > You have a projection home theater in your basement, complete with > popcorn machine. You may be slightly outside the typical definition > of "consumer". ;-) > > -- Ben > > >
