We run a Win 2008 R2 domain (forest/domain functional level) - in a
parent/child domain configuration; all users and resources in the child
domain. We want to upgrade to Win2012 R2 AD (mostly to stay current, and
also because we want to start using DFS for our user profiles .. but that's
another post). Anyway, as first steps toward domain upgrade, I am checking
replication (and later dcdiag). And I am noticing something I am not
understanding ..

My replication times seem to be increasing more than what I think should be
normal. I have 4 sites - 2 have 1 DC each, 1 has 2 DCs, the last has 6 (3
DCs for the root domain, 3 DCs for the child domain). Doing "repadmin
/replsummary" is showing me the largest delta is increasing between the
servers in site #4, up to about an hour. And not going above 15 minutes or
so for the other DCs in the remote sites.

Mind you, there are no fails, no errors. Just oddly high times, and mostly
in the "Source DSA" section (the times are much better in the "Destination
DSA" section.

And then they will drop down .. Look at the difference 100 seconds make, in
the list of deltas:

C:\Users\admin>repadmin /replsummary
Replication Summary Start Time: 2014-09-16 09:58:09

Beginning data collection for replication summary, this may take awhile:
  .............


Source DSA          largest delta    fails/total %%   error
 Site-1-001               14m:20s    0 /  12    0
 Parent-Site-4-001        14m:20s    0 /  24    0
 Parent-Site-4-002        14m:20s    0 /  24    0
 Parent-Site-4-003        59m:20s    0 /  20    0
Site-4-001                59m:20s    0 /  38    0
Site-4-002                59m:20s    0 /  40    0
Site-4-003                10m:34s    0 /  34    0
 Site-2-001               14m:20s    0 /  18    0
Site-3-001                14m:20s    0 /  24    0
Site-3-002                14m:20s    0 /  12    0


Destination DSA     largest delta    fails/total %%   error
 Site-1-001               06m:53s    0 /  18    0
 Parent-Site-4-001        11m:56s    0 /  20    0
 Parent-Site-4-002        06m:31s    0 /  16    0
 Parent-Site-4-003        01m:07s    0 /  16    0
Site-4-001                02m:00s    0 /  24    0
Site-4-002                08m:54s    0 /  38    0
Site-4-003                59m:20s    0 /  48    0
 Site-2-001                  :24s    0 /  12    0
Site-3-001                10m:34s    0 /  24    0
Site-3-002                05m:26s    0 /  30    0



C:\Users\admin>repadmin /replsummary
Replication Summary Start Time: 2014-09-16 09:59:49

Beginning data collection for replication summary, this may take awhile:
  .............


Source DSA          largest delta    fails/total %%   error
 Site-1-001               10m:33s    0 /  12    0
 Parent-Site-4-001        10m:34s    0 /  24    0
 Parent-Site-4-002        13m:36s    0 /  24    0
 Parent-Site-4-003        13m:36s    0 /  20    0
Site-4-001                13m:36s    0 /  38    0
Site-4-002                13m:36s    0 /  40    0
Site-4-003                12m:14s    0 /  34    0
 Site-2-001               10m:33s    0 /  18    0
Site-3-001                10m:33s    0 /  24    0
Site-3-002                12m:14s    0 /  12    0


Destination DSA     largest delta    fails/total %%   error
 Site-1-001               08m:33s    0 /  18    0
 Parent-Site-4-001        13m:36s    0 /  20    0
 Parent-Site-4-002        08m:11s    0 /  16    0
 Parent-Site-4-003        02m:47s    0 /  16    0
Site-4-001                03m:40s    0 /  24    0
Site-4-002                10m:34s    0 /  38    0
Site-4-003                01m:00s    0 /  48    0
 Site-2-001               02m:04s    0 /  12    0
Site-3-001                12m:14s    0 /  24    0
Site-3-002                07m:06s    0 /  30    0

Does that look normal?
Why 59 minutes delta for DCs in the same site, and less than 15 for remote
sites? (that's configurable, I know, but I don't think we did change it.
Where can I check the replication schedule?)

This was run on the DC Site-4-003, BTW.

I think my domain is OK, replication wise. I'm just a bit confused. Any
help in clearing my confusion much appreciated.

Reply via email to