I figured that was going to start something. ☺  I also realized as I hit the 
send button that I’d totally missed a few.  That’s a pretty impressive table.  
I wish I had the dates for 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 to add to it.

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
         those who understand binary and those who don't.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ken Schaefer
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 7:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow

I think there’s a few OSes that are numbered (NT 3.1, 3.5, 4.0 etc.). Others 
had years (95, 98, 2000 etc.)

Windows 95 is not an environment that runs on top of DOS. DOS is used to 
bootstrap the system, however once the Win95 loader takes over, DOS is 
relegated to a “VM” effectively, to run 16bit DOS apps. Win95 implements its 
own 32bit kernel, virtual memory manager, driver framework etc: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_95 (or there’s great coverage in the 
earlier editions of Windows Internals)



NT Family

Consumer Family

Apr 1992



Windows 3.1

Oct 1992



WfW 3.1

July 1993

Windows NT 3.1



Sep 1994

Windows NT 3.5



May 1995

Windows NT 3.51



Aug 1995



Windows 95

July 1996

Windows NT 4.0



Aug 1998



Windows 98

Feb 2000

Windows 2000



Sep 2000



Windows ME

Oct 2001

Windows XP (5.1)

Nov 2006

Windows Vista (6)

Oct 2009

Windows 7 (6.1)

Oct 2012

Windows 8 (6.2)

Oct 2013

Windows 8.1 (6.3)


Cheers
Ken

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Melvin Backus
Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2014 11:00 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow

Windows 8.x was an anomaly.  Well, OK, maybe a temporary return to anomalous 
behavior?  Looking at what we’ve had there hasn’t been a numbered version 
except 7 and 8, at least that were actually true operating systems.

Windows 1.0 (not really an OS, just an application specific environment running 
on DOS)
Windows 2.0 (not really an OS, just an environment running on DOS)
Windows 3.x (not really an OS, just an environment running on DOS)
Windows 95 (not really an OS, just an environment running on DOS)
Windows NT 3.5
Windows NT 4.0
Windows ME
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows 7
Windows 8.x

And if you look at the version numbers from within the OS,  XP was really 5, 
while 7, 8, 8.1, all report as version 6.x

Has anyone loaded the preview yet?  How does it report?  I’m guessing it 
doesn’t report as 9, more likely 6.4.x.  I’ve downloaded it but haven’t time to 
load it yet.

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
         those who understand binary and those who don't.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hank Arnold
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 4:29 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow

Seriously, I suspect it was decided to make a virtual break from W8. W10 is not 
just a follow-on for W8.

Regards,
Hank Arnold
[MVP Logo_Small]
Consumer Security

“There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
Those who understand binary and those who don't.”

My Blog: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/personal-pc-assistant/
Twitter: @Hank_PCDoc
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hank.arnold.96

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:15 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow

As Scott Hanselman tweeted….

It had to be Windows 10… because 7 8 9

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:08 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow

Well, at least they didn't go with #wtf.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rod Trent 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Actually, it’s been shortened. Now: #wth

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:55 PM
Subject: [NTSysADM] #windowsnext is the hashtag to follow



Reply via email to