Out of curiosity, what OS are you running this from?  And have you tried to run 
it from other OS versions?  I’ve found that Robocopy changes a few things in 
each OS rev and I’ve never found a good explanation of the changes.  For 
instance in Win8, copying the security permissions would take a very long time 
by default due to some changes.  Also, including the Owner attribute would 
appear as though the file was modified each time.  And in Win7/Server 2008r2, 
there was another similar bug that had a hotfix: 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2646535.

For speed, I would try to see if /copy:da along with /nodcopy helps by any 
chance.  And in case you are using /z, try to skip that for the test since I’ve 
seen performance gains when not using that.

I personally don’t have any other recommendations for sync tools that would 
scale to millions of files (I use FreeFileSync for our user’s on their laptops 
though and it works very well though).

-Aakash Shah

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 4:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] syncing millions of files in a folder

Obviously robocopy's syntax has changed....I can't imagine a utility like that 
being canned! It's not a UAC issue, is it?
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
________________________________
From: Dave Eldridge <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sender: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:08:30 -0700
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
ReplyTo: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] syncing millions of files in a folder

looking for what people use to sync/copy folders that have millions of files in 
them. we have one such folder that i used to copy with robocopy. It would blat 
me the additional changes for that day. Worked great for a few years. It 
stopped working a while ago and i can't seem to restart it. robocopy from a 
command line just sits there forever.
What has anyone else tried for this type of process?
thanks
dave

Reply via email to