based on your response i gather you suggest the following;create delegated AD 
accounts just for these tasks, AND make their day to day accounts standard 
users?

  

Jean-Paul Natola

 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: delegate vs dedicated -was [NTSysADM] Fwd: FW: Heads Up! New 
Hybrid Ransomware Replicates Like A Virus
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:14:21 +0000









Both (a) and (b).
 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P

Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 7:53 PM

To: NT

Subject: delegate vs dedicated -was [NTSysADM] Fwd: FW: Heads Up! New Hybrid 
Ransomware Replicates Like A Virus


 

So one of my clients  has finally taken heed to what i told them a long time 
ago about having domain admin rights on their day-to-day account. Perhaps this 
article i sent them (thanks ASB)
 scared them LOL

 


It's a small place, 2 sites,  about a dozen servers (w2012, Exchange, 2X, 3CX, 
Citrix, timesheets, etc...)  and ~50 desktops 


 


They finally came to their senses and realized, running as a domain admin , 
just may not be in their best interest, hence my question;


 


Is it better to;


A) create specific accounts for these functions


or


B) delegate ?


 


The only AD functions they do are , create user/exchange accounts, password 
resets, account unlocking, the occasional kicking out of a hung Citrix/2X/TS 
session,
 and maybe a reboot of server here and there.

  

TIA

 








From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Fwd: FW: Heads Up! New Hybrid Ransomware Replicates 
Like A Virus

Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:37:24 +0000

I am going to assume it installs in appdata like the rest and not worry about 
it. 
J
 
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Andrew S. Baker

Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:23 AM

Subject: [NTSysADM] Fwd: FW: Heads Up! New Hybrid Ransomware Replicates Like A 
Virus
 


Hopefully, it's not coming to a computer near you...






 
 




ASB

http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the 
SMB market…




 








 


From: CyberheistNews [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:48 AM

Subject: Heads Up! New Hybrid Ransomware Replicates Like A Virus


 




















Heads Up! New Hybrid Ransomware Replicates Like A Virus



Email not displaying correctly?

View
 Knowbe4 Blog. 

























CyberheistNews Vol 4 #47 Dec 2, 2014






























Heads
 Up! New Hybrid Ransomware Replicates Like A Virus
Here is a powerful piece of ammo to get (more) IT Security budget. SophosLabs 
labs' blog reported about a new Ransomware strain with a difference - this one 
is a true self-replicating
 parasitic virus! They call it VirRansom. 
This new strain is a hybrid that combines CryptoWall-like functionality with 
active self-replicating virus infections of all files it can find. And like the 
cybercrime
 Reveton family of malware, it locks the PC's main screen demanding 0.619 
Bitcoin to let you back in. Yikes.

Let me quote Sophos for a moment: "Worms vs. Parasitics: Most worms leave you 
with one, or perhaps a handful, of infected files that weren't there before and 
need to be
 deleted. 
"Parasitic viruses, in contrast, may leave you with hundreds of infected files 
on each computer, or thousands, or more. If you leave even one of those 
infected files behind
 after a clean-up, the infection will start up all over again. 
"Worse still, the infected files can't just be deleted, because they are your 
own files that were there before the infection started. That makes cleanup much 
trickier."

The good news: The file encryption is not as advanced as CryptoWall, as the key 
to decrypt
 the files is contained in the malware itself. Your antivirus should soon be 
able to decrypt the files and restore them, unless the bad guys are constantly 
changing the encryption keys in which case it may take a day or more before 
your AV catches up.

The bad news: This is a full-fledged virus which will spread across your 
network and doing
 a less than perfect job on the disinfection can easily lead to reinfection of 
your whole network.

CryptoWall-encrypted files that you can't or don't decrypt are harmless garbage 
forever, but you can delete them. With VirRansom, files that you don't decrypt 
are still
 recoverable, but also still actively infectious. 
It gets nastier all the time. You can expect a VirRansom 2.0 soon where they 
might implement "new features" like industrial-strength encryption like 
CryptoWall where you
 only get the decryption keys after payment, and things like infection of your 
email server, where emails are converted to a worm for maximum dissemination of 
their malcode. (Think about the legal ramifications of something like this.)

You can mitigate these types of threats through both technical measures and 
enforcing security policy. First some technical approaches:

·        
The very first thing you need to do is test the Restore function of your 
backups and make sure it works. And have a full set of backups offsite.
·        
Start thinking about asynchronous real-time backups so you can restore files 
with a few mouse clicks.
·        
Get rid of mapped drives and use UNC links for shared folders.
·        
Whitelisting software, which only allows known-good executables to run, starts 
to look more attractive by the month.
Looking at the security policy angle, it's time to enforce best practices, and 
one of those is of course prevent these types of infections to begin with, 
through effective
 5-th generation security awareness training, as the infection vector is your 
end-user opening up an attachment or clicking on a link. Find out how 
affordable this is for your organization. Get a quote now:

http://info.knowbe4.com/kmsat_get_a_quote_now

Shipping Problem Phishing Attacks - Here Is How They Look
Last CyberheistNews issue, we warned that Black Friday and Cyber Monday were 
behind us, and that criminal hackers have a "scam calendar" which focuses on 
major shopping
 events exactly like this. Here are 4 actual examples of these online 
e-commerce order or package shipment phishing attacks that have come in over 
the last week. The first one is a bogus Home Depot order that they want you to 
click on and make your PC into
 a botnet zombie. Images at the full blog post here:

http://blog.knowbe4.com/shipping-problem-phishing-attacks-here-is-how-they-look

How Was Sony Pictures Hacked?
Kevin Mandia, who was hired as the forensics expert wrote in a letter to Sony's 
CEO that the breach was unprecendented, well-planned and carried out by an 
"organized group".
 It's the most destructive cyber attack reported to date against a company on 
U.S. soil.

As Terabytes of data were exfiltrated, there will be a treasure trove of 
confidential data which will be leaked over the next weeks or months. But how 
was Sony hacked?
 The Grugg recently tweeted: "Well, pretty much every single hacked network in 
the news can be summarized: 'It started with an email...'" I would not be 
surprised if this was the case with Sony as well.

While security experts have been able to test the wiper malware employed 
against Sony Pictures Entertainment, they say they have not yet exactly 
determined how the malware
 infected Sony in the first place. "My educated guess would be that someone was 
targeted [with] a spear phishing e-mail, which granted access to a system," Tom 
Chapman, director of the cyber-operations group at cybersecurity firm EdgeWave, 
tells Information
 Security Media Group. "The hacker(s) then escalated privileges and took 
control of the mail server and possibly the Active Directory. From there, the 
hackers owned the system."

The attackers appear to have had an edge, in that they seem to be very familiar 
with Sony's network topology. "We have been investigating the attack and 
discovered new
 pieces of malware that are likely related to the same attackers," says 
security researcher Jaime Blasco, labs director of security management and 
threat intelligence vendor AlienVault. "From the samples we obtained, we can 
say the attackers knew the internal
 network from Sony since the malware samples contain hardcoded names of servers 
inside Sony's network and even credentials/usernames and passwords that the 
malware uses to connect to system inside the network."

The North Koreans are highly likely to blame. You might think that a country 
that has problems delivering enough electricity to its citizens would not be 
that sophisticated,
 but their hackers are trained by the Russians and the Chinese and Pyongyang 
runs some of its hacking operations out of a luxury hotel in nearby Shenyang, 
China.

It is obvious that Sony's defense-in-depth security policy was deeply flawed in 
either incorrectly stating the right procedures or failing to enforce them. Not 
having the
 breach detection tools in place to spot terabytes of data leaving the building 
is another epic fail. More:

http://www.cuinfosecurity.com/sony-hack-destover-malware-identified-a-7638

 
Warm Regards,

Stu Sjouwerman 
 











 
You can read CyberheistNews online at our Blog!

http://blog.knowbe4.com/cyberheistnews-vol-4-47-new-hybrid-ransomware-replicates-like-a-virus

































   

   

   

   

   





Copyright © 2014-2015 KnowBe4 LLC, All rights reserved.






Our mailing address is:


601 Cleveland St. Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida, 33760 



























 





                                          

Reply via email to