That's what I recall the recommendation to be.
On Jun 29, 2016 10:29 AM, "Charles F Sullivan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That’s more generous than what we do.
>
>
>
> The Enterprise and Schema Admins groups are empty, enforced by a
> Restricted Groups GPO setting. There is another one of these that limits
> membership in Domain Admins to just the 5 of us who are supposed to be. In
> the rare case where something needs Enterprise or Schema Admin rights, we
> temporarily add one of the domain admins via the respective Restricted
> Group setting.
>
>
>
> We only have one large domain, which makes this quite feasible. Possibly a
> more complex forest wouldn’t be.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:49 PM
> *To:* 'NT System Admin Issues Discussion list' <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Enterprise Admin best practice
>
>
>
> I remember hearing, I believe on this list, that the best practice for the
> Enterprise Admin role was to only have a service account in that role, with
> a very complex password, that is written down and locked in a file
> cabinet.  I’ve just implemented that, but now I’m getting blowback.  Does
> anyone have anything in writing that talks about this process, and that
> yes, this is best practice?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>

Reply via email to