Does anyone have a contact for Juniper, or do I buy from my regular
vendor (CDW/PCM etcc)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue Netgear
GS748Tv5
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:29:16 +0000
Support from JTAC on the Juniper product line has been fantastic in my
experience.
On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:12 PM, J- P <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Asidr from the Cisco, who has the best support?
can i pick up the phone and get actual human being on the phone? As
this will become the core , support is a big.factor.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:56:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue
Netgear GS748Tv5
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
HP's command set is similar to, but much simpler than Cisco's. The
web interfaces I've found to be mildly useful. I found it easy to
transition from Cisco to HP.
Juniper's command set is a good deal different than Cisco's, and I
like it more than I do Cisco's though it can be confusing until you
get used to it. But the Juniper web site has a pretty cool
Cisco-to-Juniper translator than can help, and the web interface,
especially on the newest firmware, is pretty darn nice. Also, there
are two display modes for command output on the Juniper - one of
which is something like XML (the native interface, and I'm growing
to like it), and another using "display set", which shows a more
line-oriented output, more like Cisco's output.
Ubiquiti's don't have a terribly good command line - it's just
easier to use the web interface in most cases, and I haven't had
much need for the CLI on it. Bang for buck, they're very nice.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:28 PM, J- P <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Im by no means a ccna, but i do know Cisco as I service
business and that is all they use , i dont do the full
configs as i just set them up, enable the port and web acces
(where applicable ) and the "mother ship" takes over from there.
Now ive never used Procurve , brocade, juniper , but if
the cli.is <http://cli.is/> the same or similar im willimg.to
<http://willimg.to/> explore
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:00:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp issue
Netgear GS748Tv5
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Any CAD or video editing, or similar high-bandwidth data movers?
If not, then most anything will work.
Do you have a personal preference for any brand? That is, are
you well experienced with a particular brand of switch, or are
you relatively inexperienced with switches?
If you have a preference, stick with it. If not, I'd suggest
either HP or Ubiquiti.
If the environment has big data movers, then check the backplane
capacity for the various switches, and you might consider
Juniper as well as HP or Ubiquiti.
I'm becoming more a fan of Juniper all the time, but they aren't
much like Cisco or HP.
Cisco would be my last resort, because of price more than
anything else - they're otherwise fine switches.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, J- P <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Currently flat,
60 workstations, 60 phones, 12 printers
8 AP's, about 12 poe door buzzers, pa's and they will be
getting 12 ip cameras
A couple of synology that have 4 1gb nic
i site to site
4 physical servers, 2 of them hyperv (hosting 4 vms each
) both servers have 4 1 gb nics,
primary internet is 100mb
backup internet is 25mb
about 20 concurrent remote users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:09:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] core suggestions was- VLAN dhcp
issue Netgear GS748Tv5
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
How complex is the environment, how many staff are
supported, how many VLANs, how much data moves across the
LAN, what's the peak throughput, etc?
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:49 PM, J- P <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Got approval for new core,
Im thinking Cisco or Procurve ,
givem that all other switches are netgear and only have
1gb sfp uplink ports does anyone have suggestions,
opinions , reccomendations ?
TiA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:23:04 +0000
Core sort of implies layer 3.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary and those who don't.
*From:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *J- P
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:17 PM
*To:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5
Hmm, hack, alternative , not words i feel comfy with
when its a core switch -
maybe I'll get them to buy something better
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:50:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Its been a long time since I've come across an equipment
situation like this, but I've seen it before. When
planned for, its a way to spend less on your equipment.
Unfortunately, sometimes people get caught in a
situation realizing the hard-way, that they are missing
some expected functionality.
As a last resort, I'd look into somehow
hacking/activating the functionality. Perhaps an
alternate firmware can be forced on it.
--
Espi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:53 PM, J- P
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Looks like you hit the nail on the head, per this
article i need either a 2nd switch, or use the firewall
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/26167971/Netgear-GS748T-setting-up-several-VLAN's-but-having-DHCP-broadcasting-across-all-ports.html
<https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/26167971/Netgear-GS748T-setting-up-several-VLAN%27s-but-having-DHCP-broadcasting-across-all-ports.html>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:16:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Hi J-P,
I didnt really see a question in your initial post,
but if I'm understanding your frustration correctly:
If there are no DHCP helper options, I dont see how
this could work. DHCP is a broadcast protocol, and
needs a helper mechanism to cross networks. I can
only assume that this model is a lower-tiered option
that is meant to be stacked with a higher-tiered
managed switch.
I saw a similarly themed question posted here:
https://community.netgear.com/t5/Smart-Plus-Click-Switches/Why-have-none-of-Netgear-s-L2-switches-a-DHCP-relay-agent/td-p/500749
<https://community.netgear.com/t5/Smart-Plus-Click-Switches/Why-have-none-of-Netgear-s-L2-switches-a-DHCP-relay-agent/td-p/500749>
--
Espi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, J- P
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Anyone, Bueller,
Jean-Paul Natola
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] VLAN dhcp issue Netgear GS748Tv5
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:47:11 -0400
Hi all,
I've been testing VLAN on a GS748tv5 I
emphasize v5 as netgear tends to create
different devices and only differentiate them by
the version , as a matter of fact this device
does not have a "ip-helper, or dhcp relay"
options (yes I know, its old , and crappy anyway),
So I created vlan5 , assigned it an IP
192.168.5.1 , added the firewall port
and test pc port to the vlan and since I have
no option for ip-helper or DHCP relay, the PC
received no ip address (and yes, I did create
the DHCP scope 192.168.5.x on my 08r2 server, )
If I give the pc a static address (i.e
192.168.5.x ) I can then successfully ping
192.168.5.1 , further research said to enable
DHCP option 82 on the DHCP server;
https://www.google.com/search?q=dhcp+option+82&ie=&oe=
<https://www.google.com/search?q=dhcp+option+82&ie=&oe=>
which of course doesn't exist in 08, so I tried
to manually create option 82, still no joy-
if anyone can share any thoughts it would be
greatly appreciated
and before anyone asks, there is no CLI, no
Shell, no Terminal on this POS switch
Jean-Paul Natola
